A Study of Metaevaluation on Taipei City''s Vocational High School Evaluation

• Main Authors: Wen-Chuan Lo, 羅文全
• Other Authors: 張仁家
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2005
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/38hy69

碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 技術及職業教育研究所 === 93 === The study aimed at understanding the approval degree, the diversity toward Taipei City''s Vocational High School evaluation, and the diversity of approval degree on different background of members in Taipei City''s Vocational High School evaluation committee and those who had been evaluated. Companied by taking survey on members of committee, the researcher took school administrators who had participated in Taipei City''s Vocational High School evaluation as population, and used sampling method to get sample. Questionnaires were given out on April 23, 2005 and urged knocking off during May 4 to May 11. 420 people of the being evaluated school and 129 people of the committee members had received the questionnaires. 347 questionnaires had been mailed back by schools which had being evaluated. After 10 invalid questionnaires were eliminated, the researcher got 337 valid questionnaires, so the valid rate was 80.2%. On the committee member part, 88 questionnaires had been mailed back. After 2 invalid questionnaires were eliminated, the researcher got 86 valid questionnaires, so the valid rate was 66.7%.The data of the questionnaires was analyzed by using frequency distribution, percentage, mean and standard deviation, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Krustal Wallis H test, a posteriori multiple comparison--Scheffe'' method. The finding of this research was as follows: 1. After taking an average from five selected item: highly approval, approval, average, disapproval, highly disapproval, those who had been evaluated owned a little higher than average approval degree on the whole, and on every standardized level (utility , feasibility , propriety , accuracy). 2. Committee members owned approval degree on the whole, and on every standardized level (utility, feasibility, propriety, accuracy). 3. Those who had been evaluated and served school for 11-20years (included) showed highly approval degree than those who served school for less than 10 years. 4. Those who had been evaluated and served in "Vocational High School" showed highly approval degree than those who served in "Senior High School which also include vocational high school program". 5. Compared with those who had been evaluated and served in "Private high school", those who had been evaluated and served in "Public high school" showed highly approval degree toward "propriety" item. 6. Those who had been evaluated and had different background showed no significant difference on the whole approval degree. 7. Those committee members who had participant different evaluation area showed obvious difference on the whole approval degree. 8. Whether those committee members who had experience in teaching vocational high school or not, the research showed no significant difference on the whole approval degree,and 9. Compared with those who had been evaluated, the committee members showed highly approval degree on the whole, and on every standardized level.