Investor Rights under US VC Investment Contracts -- How Liquidation Preference, Anti-dilution, and Pay-to-play affect investor payback
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 財務金融組 === 93 === Investment professionals adjust their playbook to go with the times. As the collapse of the technology bubble in early 2000’s has instigated changing prospects for the venture capital industry, it has profoundly altered the way how investors structure their deals....
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2005
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13386447818950972632 |
id |
ndltd-TW-093NTU05305004 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-093NTU053050042015-12-21T04:04:05Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13386447818950972632 Investor Rights under US VC Investment Contracts -- How Liquidation Preference, Anti-dilution, and Pay-to-play affect investor payback 美國創投契約對投資人權益之影響--以清算分配優先權,反稀釋條款,與購買參與權為例 Hsiu-hsian CHEN 陳修賢 碩士 國立臺灣大學 財務金融組 93 Investment professionals adjust their playbook to go with the times. As the collapse of the technology bubble in early 2000’s has instigated changing prospects for the venture capital industry, it has profoundly altered the way how investors structure their deals. Already North American VCs have spent an inordinate amount of efforts in stemming potential losses in all possible avenues of profit or loss. This thesis aims to illustrate the new pattern of deal structure with a real case, a Silicon Valley-based networked storage system company that underwent multiple rounds of private financing in the last four years. Under scrutiny are two clauses related to investor downside protection that always appear in investment term sheets: liquidation preference and anti-dilution, plus another one protecting the firm that gets increasingly popular amongst VC investors lately: pay-to-play. Through modeling the economic outcomes of one Taiwanese venture capitalist’s investments into the firm’s last two rounds, the thesis demonstrate how different deal terms lead to different financial consequences for the investor. The calculation and analysis demonstrates marked quantitative differences regarding investor well-being between varying contract designs. On paper, the ones who get assertive claiming a more favorable deal seemingly attain the upper hand. Yet the readers also have to be aware of the intricate situation that an early-stage lead investor faces when working with the entrepreneurs and the existing investors to strike a deal of new funding. Only when optimal balance is reached between the three interests can the financing truly help the long-success of the venture. Even though it is very unusual for Taiwan-based VCs to play as a lead investor in US VC financing, Taiwanese venture capitalists still need to build the skill set and knowledge base to cope with the new patterns of US VC investment terms and conditions. Only by having a deal’s potential risks well understood and covered can one smartly recoup the investment upsides. 陳業寧 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 46 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 財務金融組 === 93 === Investment professionals adjust their playbook to go with the times. As the collapse of the technology bubble in early 2000’s has instigated changing prospects for the venture capital industry, it has profoundly altered the way how investors structure their deals. Already North American VCs have spent an inordinate amount of efforts in stemming potential losses in all possible avenues of profit or loss.
This thesis aims to illustrate the new pattern of deal structure with a real case, a Silicon Valley-based networked storage system company that underwent multiple rounds of private financing in the last four years. Under scrutiny are two clauses related to investor downside protection that always appear in investment term sheets: liquidation preference and anti-dilution, plus another one protecting the firm that gets increasingly popular amongst VC investors lately: pay-to-play. Through modeling the economic outcomes of one Taiwanese venture capitalist’s investments into the firm’s last two rounds, the thesis demonstrate how different deal terms lead to different financial consequences for the investor.
The calculation and analysis demonstrates marked quantitative differences regarding investor well-being between varying contract designs. On paper, the ones who get assertive claiming a more favorable deal seemingly attain the upper hand. Yet the readers also have to be aware of the intricate situation that an early-stage lead investor faces when working with the entrepreneurs and the existing investors to strike a deal of new funding. Only when optimal balance is reached between the three interests can the financing truly help the long-success of the venture.
Even though it is very unusual for Taiwan-based VCs to play as a lead investor in US VC financing, Taiwanese venture capitalists still need to build the skill set and knowledge base to cope with the new patterns of US VC investment terms and conditions. Only by having a deal’s potential risks well understood and covered can one smartly recoup the investment upsides.
|
author2 |
陳業寧 |
author_facet |
陳業寧 Hsiu-hsian CHEN 陳修賢 |
author |
Hsiu-hsian CHEN 陳修賢 |
spellingShingle |
Hsiu-hsian CHEN 陳修賢 Investor Rights under US VC Investment Contracts -- How Liquidation Preference, Anti-dilution, and Pay-to-play affect investor payback |
author_sort |
Hsiu-hsian CHEN |
title |
Investor Rights under US VC Investment Contracts -- How Liquidation Preference, Anti-dilution, and Pay-to-play affect investor payback |
title_short |
Investor Rights under US VC Investment Contracts -- How Liquidation Preference, Anti-dilution, and Pay-to-play affect investor payback |
title_full |
Investor Rights under US VC Investment Contracts -- How Liquidation Preference, Anti-dilution, and Pay-to-play affect investor payback |
title_fullStr |
Investor Rights under US VC Investment Contracts -- How Liquidation Preference, Anti-dilution, and Pay-to-play affect investor payback |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investor Rights under US VC Investment Contracts -- How Liquidation Preference, Anti-dilution, and Pay-to-play affect investor payback |
title_sort |
investor rights under us vc investment contracts -- how liquidation preference, anti-dilution, and pay-to-play affect investor payback |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13386447818950972632 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hsiuhsianchen investorrightsunderusvcinvestmentcontractshowliquidationpreferenceantidilutionandpaytoplayaffectinvestorpayback AT chénxiūxián investorrightsunderusvcinvestmentcontractshowliquidationpreferenceantidilutionandpaytoplayaffectinvestorpayback AT hsiuhsianchen měiguóchuàngtóuqìyuēduìtóuzīrénquányìzhīyǐngxiǎngyǐqīngsuànfēnpèiyōuxiānquánfǎnxīshìtiáokuǎnyǔgòumǎicānyǔquánwèilì AT chénxiūxián měiguóchuàngtóuqìyuēduìtóuzīrénquányìzhīyǐngxiǎngyǐqīngsuànfēnpèiyōuxiānquánfǎnxīshìtiáokuǎnyǔgòumǎicānyǔquánwèilì |
_version_ |
1718153740052070400 |