Asymptotical Inference for a Simple Dynamic Panel Data Model when Both N and T Are Large
碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 經濟學系 === 93 === My thesis investigates the asymptotics of dynamic panel data when cross section and time series dimensions tend to infinity. In traditional dynamic panel data analysis, we only consider asymptotics under N closed to infinity and T fixed. GMM methods always use to ha...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2005
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/48657423842257760654 |
id |
ndltd-TW-093NTPU0389009 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-093NTPU03890092015-12-25T04:10:29Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/48657423842257760654 Asymptotical Inference for a Simple Dynamic Panel Data Model when Both N and T Are Large 動態追蹤資料在大樣本下參數估計漸近性的再探討 Li, Chu-Chien 李竹健 碩士 國立臺北大學 經濟學系 93 My thesis investigates the asymptotics of dynamic panel data when cross section and time series dimensions tend to infinity. In traditional dynamic panel data analysis, we only consider asymptotics under N closed to infinity and T fixed. GMM methods always use to handle dynamic panel data model. However the panel data collection has a lot of programs recently. Economists will face some panel data sets with N closed to infinity and T closed to infinity in empirical analysis. In thesis, we inspect the traditional estimation methods for dynamic panel data under N closed to infinity and T closed to infinity within traditional ways to handle dynamic panel data. We set T/N ratio for well defined convergence path. The ratio of T/N we set in our thesis are 0, 1/2, 1, and infinity. There are totally five estimation methods considered in this paper: within-group estimation, instrumental variable estimation, generalized method of moments estimation, two stage least square estimation and maximum likelihood estimation. The results of simulation show the estimator using the lag two period observation as the instrumental variable is the best. When the parameter is 0.9, the two stage least square estimator is better than generalized method of moments estimation. If 0<T/N 1/2, researcher can use two stage least square estimation with T being smaller and generalized method of moments estimation with T being larger. When T/N=1, the best way is instrumental variable estimation. Finally, the within-group estimator may be a better choice if 1<T/N<infinity. Because its asymptotical bias will be converge with T increasing. Wang, Chien-Ho 王健合 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 42 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 經濟學系 === 93 === My thesis investigates the asymptotics of dynamic panel data when cross section and time series dimensions tend to infinity. In traditional dynamic panel data analysis, we only consider asymptotics under N closed to infinity and T fixed. GMM methods always use to handle dynamic panel data model. However the panel data collection has a lot of programs recently.
Economists will face some panel data sets with N closed to infinity and T closed to infinity in empirical analysis. In thesis, we inspect the traditional estimation methods for dynamic panel data under N closed to infinity and T closed to infinity within traditional ways to handle dynamic panel data.
We set T/N ratio for well defined convergence path. The ratio of T/N we set in our thesis are 0, 1/2, 1, and infinity. There are totally five estimation methods considered in this paper: within-group estimation, instrumental variable estimation, generalized method of moments estimation, two stage least square estimation and maximum likelihood estimation.
The results of simulation show the estimator using the lag two period observation as the instrumental variable is the best. When the parameter is 0.9, the two stage least square estimator is better than generalized method of moments estimation. If 0<T/N 1/2, researcher can use two stage least square estimation with T being smaller and generalized method of moments estimation with T being larger. When T/N=1, the best way is instrumental variable estimation. Finally, the within-group estimator may be a better choice if 1<T/N<infinity. Because its asymptotical bias will be converge with T increasing.
|
author2 |
Wang, Chien-Ho |
author_facet |
Wang, Chien-Ho Li, Chu-Chien 李竹健 |
author |
Li, Chu-Chien 李竹健 |
spellingShingle |
Li, Chu-Chien 李竹健 Asymptotical Inference for a Simple Dynamic Panel Data Model when Both N and T Are Large |
author_sort |
Li, Chu-Chien |
title |
Asymptotical Inference for a Simple Dynamic Panel Data Model when Both N and T Are Large |
title_short |
Asymptotical Inference for a Simple Dynamic Panel Data Model when Both N and T Are Large |
title_full |
Asymptotical Inference for a Simple Dynamic Panel Data Model when Both N and T Are Large |
title_fullStr |
Asymptotical Inference for a Simple Dynamic Panel Data Model when Both N and T Are Large |
title_full_unstemmed |
Asymptotical Inference for a Simple Dynamic Panel Data Model when Both N and T Are Large |
title_sort |
asymptotical inference for a simple dynamic panel data model when both n and t are large |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/48657423842257760654 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lichuchien asymptoticalinferenceforasimpledynamicpaneldatamodelwhenbothnandtarelarge AT lǐzhújiàn asymptoticalinferenceforasimpledynamicpaneldatamodelwhenbothnandtarelarge AT lichuchien dòngtàizhuīzōngzīliàozàidàyàngběnxiàcānshùgūjìjiànjìnxìngdezàitàntǎo AT lǐzhújiàn dòngtàizhuīzōngzīliàozàidàyàngběnxiàcānshùgūjìjiànjìnxìngdezàitàntǎo |
_version_ |
1718157380948066304 |