| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 公共事務管理研究所 === 93 === Due to the prosperity of industry and business in these days, the population density is getting higher and higher. At the meantime of high development pursuit, life quality, ecology balance, health, and the environment for the descendants are as well affected. With the rise of environmental protection consciousness, the hope to defend individual rights and protect living surrounding is more highly emphasized. Because of the lack of pertinent access, people go out protesting their rights which has caused disorder and chaos in our society. It has had negative impacts on no matter environmental protection, economic development, governmental authority, and image of “serving.”
It is the most important principle of the environmental protection bureau to base on citizens’ opinions towards environment while handing down a policy. The performance evaluation at present stage, therefore, is actually a chief reference for ongoing policy making and efficiency improving.
The presently used method of efficiency evaluation has long been questioned and challenged; for example, the prudence and objectiveness of evaluation, fairness and justice of the contrived evaluating mode, economy of the evaluating process, lack of constructive advises to inefficient evaluated departments, and so on. In that case, the study manages to adopt a more objective method, Data Environment Analysis, and to evaluate and discuss the performance and main causes of efficiency differences aiming at the environmental protection bureaus in every county.
With the purpose of making the outcome more objective, the study makes use of in-depth interview, Pearson Correlation, and input-output combination analysis to determine the evaluating criteria. Other than setting up the standard, the researcher furthermore conducts an empirical study by integrating DEA and regression analysis. Through the utilization of regression analysis can let on whether exogenous variables have obvious effects on the efficiency score.
Lastly, this research managed to calculate the overall efficiency score gained from the DEA application from 1999 to 2001. The aim is also to find out the satisfaction with how the Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan has dealed with grievance statements for the past three years. The purpose is to discover the relationship between the overall efficiency score and the satisfaction degree. Via the study, findings of more relevant issues are expected and also the researcher hopes to provide the decision-making authority reference to make improvements for future measures.
|
|---|
