The Comparison Study of Fire Performance of Building Materials Evaluated by Different Fire Tests

碩士 === 國立高雄第一科技大學 === 環境與安全衛生工程所 === 93 === Using fire retardant interior finish materials is one of the most effective ways to achieve fire safety in buildings. Adequate fire tests are needed to test materials. Now in Taiwan, the Surface Test and Incombustibility Test (CNS 6532) are used. In additi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I-LIN LAI, 賴宜麟
Other Authors: Kuang-Chung Tasi
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/56475776385100041317
id ndltd-TW-093NKIT5519024
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093NKIT55190242016-06-06T04:11:05Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/56475776385100041317 The Comparison Study of Fire Performance of Building Materials Evaluated by Different Fire Tests 使用不同防火試驗法測試各式材料組合之防火性能比較 I-LIN LAI 賴宜麟 碩士 國立高雄第一科技大學 環境與安全衛生工程所 93 Using fire retardant interior finish materials is one of the most effective ways to achieve fire safety in buildings. Adequate fire tests are needed to test materials. Now in Taiwan, the Surface Test and Incombustibility Test (CNS 6532) are used. In addition, the Cone Calorimeter (ISO 5660), LIFT (ISO 5658) and Room Test (ISO 9705) are used internationally. Among those test methods, only Room Test is a full-scale test. In addition, the size and orientation of specimen, capability of igniter and thermal environment of those test methods are different, which are regarded to influence the fire behavior of materials. These differences may lead to different fire performance classes when materials are tested using those test methods. The consistency of test results using those methods is consequently evaluated in this study. Furthermore, the feasibility of replacing a full-scale test by small-scale tests, the effect of surface materials, e.g. wall paper and wall cloth, and the thickness of substrate on the fire performance class judgment were studied. 34 materials were tested using those test methods and results were analyzed in the view of fire dynamics. Four fire parameters including heat release rate, smoke production, surface ignitibility and mass loss were discussed. The results showed that, in heat release evaluation, the relations among the test results are significant (R2>0.75) except Incombustibility Test. However, the relations of data of smoke production, surface ignitibility and mass loss are not obvious. In addition, after attaching wall paper or wall cloth on materials, the fire performance class of materials was changed in this study. It can be seen that the choosing of surface materials is important. Furthermore, the thickness of substrate did not influence the fire performance in Surface Test but in Incombustibility Test. Kuang-Chung Tasi 蔡匡忠 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 91 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立高雄第一科技大學 === 環境與安全衛生工程所 === 93 === Using fire retardant interior finish materials is one of the most effective ways to achieve fire safety in buildings. Adequate fire tests are needed to test materials. Now in Taiwan, the Surface Test and Incombustibility Test (CNS 6532) are used. In addition, the Cone Calorimeter (ISO 5660), LIFT (ISO 5658) and Room Test (ISO 9705) are used internationally. Among those test methods, only Room Test is a full-scale test. In addition, the size and orientation of specimen, capability of igniter and thermal environment of those test methods are different, which are regarded to influence the fire behavior of materials. These differences may lead to different fire performance classes when materials are tested using those test methods. The consistency of test results using those methods is consequently evaluated in this study. Furthermore, the feasibility of replacing a full-scale test by small-scale tests, the effect of surface materials, e.g. wall paper and wall cloth, and the thickness of substrate on the fire performance class judgment were studied. 34 materials were tested using those test methods and results were analyzed in the view of fire dynamics. Four fire parameters including heat release rate, smoke production, surface ignitibility and mass loss were discussed. The results showed that, in heat release evaluation, the relations among the test results are significant (R2>0.75) except Incombustibility Test. However, the relations of data of smoke production, surface ignitibility and mass loss are not obvious. In addition, after attaching wall paper or wall cloth on materials, the fire performance class of materials was changed in this study. It can be seen that the choosing of surface materials is important. Furthermore, the thickness of substrate did not influence the fire performance in Surface Test but in Incombustibility Test.
author2 Kuang-Chung Tasi
author_facet Kuang-Chung Tasi
I-LIN LAI
賴宜麟
author I-LIN LAI
賴宜麟
spellingShingle I-LIN LAI
賴宜麟
The Comparison Study of Fire Performance of Building Materials Evaluated by Different Fire Tests
author_sort I-LIN LAI
title The Comparison Study of Fire Performance of Building Materials Evaluated by Different Fire Tests
title_short The Comparison Study of Fire Performance of Building Materials Evaluated by Different Fire Tests
title_full The Comparison Study of Fire Performance of Building Materials Evaluated by Different Fire Tests
title_fullStr The Comparison Study of Fire Performance of Building Materials Evaluated by Different Fire Tests
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison Study of Fire Performance of Building Materials Evaluated by Different Fire Tests
title_sort comparison study of fire performance of building materials evaluated by different fire tests
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/56475776385100041317
work_keys_str_mv AT ilinlai thecomparisonstudyoffireperformanceofbuildingmaterialsevaluatedbydifferentfiretests
AT làiyílín thecomparisonstudyoffireperformanceofbuildingmaterialsevaluatedbydifferentfiretests
AT ilinlai shǐyòngbùtóngfánghuǒshìyànfǎcèshìgèshìcáiliàozǔhézhīfánghuǒxìngnéngbǐjiào
AT làiyílín shǐyòngbùtóngfánghuǒshìyànfǎcèshìgèshìcáiliàozǔhézhīfánghuǒxìngnéngbǐjiào
AT ilinlai comparisonstudyoffireperformanceofbuildingmaterialsevaluatedbydifferentfiretests
AT làiyílín comparisonstudyoffireperformanceofbuildingmaterialsevaluatedbydifferentfiretests
_version_ 1718295193060376576