Analyzing Methodological Rigor of Knowledge Management Survey Research — Based on the Top 9 of Information Management Journals

碩士 === 國立高雄第一科技大學 === 資訊管理所 === 93 === Most of the studies on the information management was evaluated by Survey Research Methodology. In the present study, we analyze the international top 9 journals in the field of information management, that is MISQ (MIS Quarterly), JMIS (Journal of Management I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsai-shing Chang, 張彩杏
Other Authors: Szu-yuan Sun
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13747573304488507295
id ndltd-TW-093NKIT5396043
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093NKIT53960432016-06-06T04:11:05Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13747573304488507295 Analyzing Methodological Rigor of Knowledge Management Survey Research — Based on the Top 9 of Information Management Journals 知識管理調查研究嚴謹性之探討-以資訊管理九大期刊為例 Tsai-shing Chang 張彩杏 碩士 國立高雄第一科技大學 資訊管理所 93 Most of the studies on the information management was evaluated by Survey Research Methodology. In the present study, we analyze the international top 9 journals in the field of information management, that is MISQ (MIS Quarterly), JMIS (Journal of Management Information Systems), ISR (Information Systems Research), I&M (Information & Management), DSS (Decision Support Systems), CACM (Communications of the ACM), MS (Management Science), IJEC (International Journal of Electronic Commerce), and JKM (Journal of Knowledge Management) using the narrative method of meta-research. According to the criterion of ideal Survey Methodological Attributes (SMA) proposed by Grover et al.,(1993), the level and quality of survey research methodology appeared in these previous mentioned journals were evaluated. At the same time, we try to find out the attributes of an ideal survey research by the following 9 criteria, including 1) use a combination of personal, telephone, and mail data collection; 2) adopt a validated instrument or perform a validity or reliability analysis; 3) report characteristics of respondents; 4) the approach used to randomize or select samples; 5) append the whole or part of the questionnaire; 6) the profile of the sample frame; 7) perform an instrument pretest or pilot test; 8) the response rate; 9) the statistical analysis of data from nonrespondents. On the other hand, to find out the point that investigators pay attention, we furthermore to observe the other characteristics in the content of research, for example, the percentage of survey research, the topic category, response rate, statistical analysis, etc. We believe that we will explore the important role of knowledge management in the circles of science industry by screening the rigor, relative thesis, and construct of knowledge management in the survey research methodology from the top 9 journals. Szu-yuan Sun 孫思源 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 60 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立高雄第一科技大學 === 資訊管理所 === 93 === Most of the studies on the information management was evaluated by Survey Research Methodology. In the present study, we analyze the international top 9 journals in the field of information management, that is MISQ (MIS Quarterly), JMIS (Journal of Management Information Systems), ISR (Information Systems Research), I&M (Information & Management), DSS (Decision Support Systems), CACM (Communications of the ACM), MS (Management Science), IJEC (International Journal of Electronic Commerce), and JKM (Journal of Knowledge Management) using the narrative method of meta-research. According to the criterion of ideal Survey Methodological Attributes (SMA) proposed by Grover et al.,(1993), the level and quality of survey research methodology appeared in these previous mentioned journals were evaluated. At the same time, we try to find out the attributes of an ideal survey research by the following 9 criteria, including 1) use a combination of personal, telephone, and mail data collection; 2) adopt a validated instrument or perform a validity or reliability analysis; 3) report characteristics of respondents; 4) the approach used to randomize or select samples; 5) append the whole or part of the questionnaire; 6) the profile of the sample frame; 7) perform an instrument pretest or pilot test; 8) the response rate; 9) the statistical analysis of data from nonrespondents. On the other hand, to find out the point that investigators pay attention, we furthermore to observe the other characteristics in the content of research, for example, the percentage of survey research, the topic category, response rate, statistical analysis, etc. We believe that we will explore the important role of knowledge management in the circles of science industry by screening the rigor, relative thesis, and construct of knowledge management in the survey research methodology from the top 9 journals.
author2 Szu-yuan Sun
author_facet Szu-yuan Sun
Tsai-shing Chang
張彩杏
author Tsai-shing Chang
張彩杏
spellingShingle Tsai-shing Chang
張彩杏
Analyzing Methodological Rigor of Knowledge Management Survey Research — Based on the Top 9 of Information Management Journals
author_sort Tsai-shing Chang
title Analyzing Methodological Rigor of Knowledge Management Survey Research — Based on the Top 9 of Information Management Journals
title_short Analyzing Methodological Rigor of Knowledge Management Survey Research — Based on the Top 9 of Information Management Journals
title_full Analyzing Methodological Rigor of Knowledge Management Survey Research — Based on the Top 9 of Information Management Journals
title_fullStr Analyzing Methodological Rigor of Knowledge Management Survey Research — Based on the Top 9 of Information Management Journals
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing Methodological Rigor of Knowledge Management Survey Research — Based on the Top 9 of Information Management Journals
title_sort analyzing methodological rigor of knowledge management survey research — based on the top 9 of information management journals
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/13747573304488507295
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaishingchang analyzingmethodologicalrigorofknowledgemanagementsurveyresearchbasedonthetop9ofinformationmanagementjournals
AT zhāngcǎixìng analyzingmethodologicalrigorofknowledgemanagementsurveyresearchbasedonthetop9ofinformationmanagementjournals
AT tsaishingchang zhīshíguǎnlǐdiàocháyánjiūyánjǐnxìngzhītàntǎoyǐzīxùnguǎnlǐjiǔdàqīkānwèilì
AT zhāngcǎixìng zhīshíguǎnlǐdiàocháyánjiūyánjǐnxìngzhītàntǎoyǐzīxùnguǎnlǐjiǔdàqīkānwèilì
_version_ 1718295151302934528