Differences and Identity under the Colonial Rules：Native Subjectivity as the writing strategy of Chang Wen-Huan and Zhong li-he

• Main Authors: Wan-Jui Wang, 王萬睿
• Other Authors: Sheng-Kuang Yu
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2005
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/49787250343900898603

碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 台灣文學研究所 === 93 === 　This dissertation aimed to ‘native subjectivity’ of Chang Wen-Huan and Zhong li-he in their novels. Although two authors were born in the Japanese colonial period in Taiwan, they almost have different experience of being an “outsider.”Chang studied in Tokyo and used Japanese to write novels, whereas Zhong worked in China and wrote in Chinese. Until they came back to Taiwan in 1938 and 1946, they must adopt two kinds of special rules of the colonial government, which were the Kominka movement and the Post-war Autocracy. 　“Native subjectivity” that they applied in their narrative structure represents a counter force of the contemporary colonial rules. Consequently, while Japanese government launched the Kominka Movement with the intention of transforming the Taiwanese into loyal subjects of the Empire, or KMT government comprised works of anti-communism, both writers realized the realism of writing actually challenged the dominant concept of ‘self-otherness’ in Japanese and Chinese culture. 　In conclusion, this thesis consequently establishes the succession relationship of the two writers. With their experiences in foreign countries, they pursued modernity, became anti-colonialistic, and finally returned to their native subjectivity.