| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 建築學系碩博士班 === 93 === In Recent years，global climate and environment changes badly. Therefore, the issue of sustainable development becomes more and more important. This concept has been emphasized from 1980.（IUCN、UNEP nad WWF，1980）It has been taken more concerns from all over the world. After the “Earth Summit” in Brazil, there is a conclusion about sustainable development in the world. With the issue of “sustainable development”, there is a definition in 2000 Sustainable Building International conference: Sustainability is operated in material 、building and urban, and it should conclude the ecology, the economical, the society cultural element, and must also reflect the regional characteristic to achieve the sustainable goal.
Taiwan is in the subtropics zone. It has its own regional characteristic. Therefore, while we impetus the direction and the content of sustainable building, it is different from the cold temperate zone the OECD country. This study attempts to suggest a sustainable building assessment tool in Taiwan which adjusted form international sustainable building assessment system. According to the research from aboard, the GBTool assessment system is used wide and emphasized on regional operation. Therefore, this study analysis the GBTool assessment system and revise to use in Taiwan.
This study use “Analytic Hierarchy Process” to analysis. According to the content and construction of the GB-Tool assessment system, the expert consultative survey is designed. With the calculation of AHP method, this study suggests that the assessment category is suitable in Taiwan, and build the assessment system in Taiwan.
According to this study, it can be testified that there are 99 assessment categories can be used in Taiwan from 108 assessment categories in GBTool. It show the customization of GBTool in Taiwan is suitable. However, this study show that the assessment issue of Energy and Resource Consumption、Long-Term Performance、Social and Economic aspects are different in Taiwan. Those assessment issues should be revised and than manipulate in Taiwan.
|
|---|
