Valuation of Bio-Tech Company by Venture Capital-Application of Real Options Theory

碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 金融研究所 === 93 === In the case of study, we investigate how venture capitalists evaluate the investment alternatives by using the real options pricing model, and help venture capitalists understand the real options value of a project. The evaluation method of real options serves a bett...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuo Chia-Hung, 郭家宏
Other Authors: Gong Shang-Chi
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57047003494891562380
id ndltd-TW-093FJU00214016
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093FJU002140162015-10-13T13:01:05Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57047003494891562380 Valuation of Bio-Tech Company by Venture Capital-Application of Real Options Theory 創業投資公司評估生物科技公司的價值-應用實質選擇權評價方法 Kuo Chia-Hung 郭家宏 碩士 輔仁大學 金融研究所 93 In the case of study, we investigate how venture capitalists evaluate the investment alternatives by using the real options pricing model, and help venture capitalists understand the real options value of a project. The evaluation method of real options serves a better idea for “Management Flexibility” in spite of the traditional method-NPV. This study utilized the log-transformed binomial method proposed by Tigeorgis(1991) to solve the problem of ignoring managerial flexibility in a traditional capital budgeting. We choose APEX International Clinical Research Co., Ltd. as the research object which has two options – the option to defer, and the option to expand. The study result can be summarized as follows: 1. The traditional NPV method which is no concern of any option value creates the value of NT$ 19.270 million, but the option to defer creates the value of NT$ 17.6194 million, the option to expand creates the value of NT$ 4.8664 million, and the option to defer & expand creates the value of NT$ 24.0010 million. This result indicated that NPV Model ignored the “Management Flexibility” so that it underestimates the value of an investment. 2. The interaction between the option to defer and the option to expand is positive. It means that the value of the option to defer & expand is larger than that of the option to defer plus the option to expand. 3.According to the sensitivity analysis, we found that:(1) The gross project value has positive impacts on expanded NPV and real options. (2) Risk-free rate has negative impacts on expanded NPV and real options. (3) Volatility has positive impacts on expanded NPV and real options. (4) Growth rate has positive impacts on expanded NPV and real options. (5) The period of growth rate has positive impacts on expanded NPV and real options. Gong Shang-Chi 龔尚智 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 73 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 金融研究所 === 93 === In the case of study, we investigate how venture capitalists evaluate the investment alternatives by using the real options pricing model, and help venture capitalists understand the real options value of a project. The evaluation method of real options serves a better idea for “Management Flexibility” in spite of the traditional method-NPV. This study utilized the log-transformed binomial method proposed by Tigeorgis(1991) to solve the problem of ignoring managerial flexibility in a traditional capital budgeting. We choose APEX International Clinical Research Co., Ltd. as the research object which has two options – the option to defer, and the option to expand. The study result can be summarized as follows: 1. The traditional NPV method which is no concern of any option value creates the value of NT$ 19.270 million, but the option to defer creates the value of NT$ 17.6194 million, the option to expand creates the value of NT$ 4.8664 million, and the option to defer & expand creates the value of NT$ 24.0010 million. This result indicated that NPV Model ignored the “Management Flexibility” so that it underestimates the value of an investment. 2. The interaction between the option to defer and the option to expand is positive. It means that the value of the option to defer & expand is larger than that of the option to defer plus the option to expand. 3.According to the sensitivity analysis, we found that:(1) The gross project value has positive impacts on expanded NPV and real options. (2) Risk-free rate has negative impacts on expanded NPV and real options. (3) Volatility has positive impacts on expanded NPV and real options. (4) Growth rate has positive impacts on expanded NPV and real options. (5) The period of growth rate has positive impacts on expanded NPV and real options.
author2 Gong Shang-Chi
author_facet Gong Shang-Chi
Kuo Chia-Hung
郭家宏
author Kuo Chia-Hung
郭家宏
spellingShingle Kuo Chia-Hung
郭家宏
Valuation of Bio-Tech Company by Venture Capital-Application of Real Options Theory
author_sort Kuo Chia-Hung
title Valuation of Bio-Tech Company by Venture Capital-Application of Real Options Theory
title_short Valuation of Bio-Tech Company by Venture Capital-Application of Real Options Theory
title_full Valuation of Bio-Tech Company by Venture Capital-Application of Real Options Theory
title_fullStr Valuation of Bio-Tech Company by Venture Capital-Application of Real Options Theory
title_full_unstemmed Valuation of Bio-Tech Company by Venture Capital-Application of Real Options Theory
title_sort valuation of bio-tech company by venture capital-application of real options theory
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57047003494891562380
work_keys_str_mv AT kuochiahung valuationofbiotechcompanybyventurecapitalapplicationofrealoptionstheory
AT guōjiāhóng valuationofbiotechcompanybyventurecapitalapplicationofrealoptionstheory
AT kuochiahung chuàngyètóuzīgōngsīpínggūshēngwùkējìgōngsīdejiàzhíyīngyòngshízhìxuǎnzéquánpíngjiàfāngfǎ
AT guōjiāhóng chuàngyètóuzīgōngsīpínggūshēngwùkējìgōngsīdejiàzhíyīngyòngshízhìxuǎnzéquánpíngjiàfāngfǎ
_version_ 1717729091629613056