Research of Time Delay in Active Structural Control

碩士 === 中原大學 === 土木工程研究所 === 93 === The purpose of this research is to study about time delay effect in active structural control. If time delay is occur in control system, then we cannot ensure not only the control system is stable but also the structure response convergence. We attempt to establish...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cho-Yen Yang, 楊卓諺
Other Authors: An-Pei Wang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5ge79t
id ndltd-TW-093CYCU5015010
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093CYCU50150102019-05-15T20:05:51Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5ge79t Research of Time Delay in Active Structural Control 時間延遲對主動結構控制之研究 Cho-Yen Yang 楊卓諺 碩士 中原大學 土木工程研究所 93 The purpose of this research is to study about time delay effect in active structural control. If time delay is occur in control system, then we cannot ensure not only the control system is stable but also the structure response convergence. We attempt to establish a neural network predictor in order to predict the state of structure, and modify the controller to compensate the time delay effect. There are two time delay compensations being used usually. One is phase shift compensation that should be identified the mode of structure and delay time. Another is solving the equation of motion on-line. This method is more efficient despite of huge number of calculations. Two kinds of controller were selected as follows: one is variable structure control system (VSS). Another is fuzzy-neural network (FNN). And two time delay compensation ways of phase shift and time delay neural network. Thus, we have two kinds of controller and two kinds of compensation ways and four combinations. Each of them are selected and compared with others. The results of numerical simulation in single degree of freedom (SDOF) structure: if the controller is FNN with delay time less than three steps, both of phase shift and time delay neural network predictor could compensate the time delay effect efficiently. On the other hand, if the controller changed to VSS with delay less than fifteen steps, both of two compensation ways could make the response become lower. However, the time delay neural network predictor is better than phase shift compensation in response of displacement, velocity and control force. In the case of three degree of freedom structure: system delay one step may cause the response of structure diverge. Phase shift compensation and time delay neural network predictor can decrease the displacement and velocity response in system delay one step. Keywords: time delay, phase shift, TDNN, neural network An-Pei Wang 王安培 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 144 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 中原大學 === 土木工程研究所 === 93 === The purpose of this research is to study about time delay effect in active structural control. If time delay is occur in control system, then we cannot ensure not only the control system is stable but also the structure response convergence. We attempt to establish a neural network predictor in order to predict the state of structure, and modify the controller to compensate the time delay effect. There are two time delay compensations being used usually. One is phase shift compensation that should be identified the mode of structure and delay time. Another is solving the equation of motion on-line. This method is more efficient despite of huge number of calculations. Two kinds of controller were selected as follows: one is variable structure control system (VSS). Another is fuzzy-neural network (FNN). And two time delay compensation ways of phase shift and time delay neural network. Thus, we have two kinds of controller and two kinds of compensation ways and four combinations. Each of them are selected and compared with others. The results of numerical simulation in single degree of freedom (SDOF) structure: if the controller is FNN with delay time less than three steps, both of phase shift and time delay neural network predictor could compensate the time delay effect efficiently. On the other hand, if the controller changed to VSS with delay less than fifteen steps, both of two compensation ways could make the response become lower. However, the time delay neural network predictor is better than phase shift compensation in response of displacement, velocity and control force. In the case of three degree of freedom structure: system delay one step may cause the response of structure diverge. Phase shift compensation and time delay neural network predictor can decrease the displacement and velocity response in system delay one step. Keywords: time delay, phase shift, TDNN, neural network
author2 An-Pei Wang
author_facet An-Pei Wang
Cho-Yen Yang
楊卓諺
author Cho-Yen Yang
楊卓諺
spellingShingle Cho-Yen Yang
楊卓諺
Research of Time Delay in Active Structural Control
author_sort Cho-Yen Yang
title Research of Time Delay in Active Structural Control
title_short Research of Time Delay in Active Structural Control
title_full Research of Time Delay in Active Structural Control
title_fullStr Research of Time Delay in Active Structural Control
title_full_unstemmed Research of Time Delay in Active Structural Control
title_sort research of time delay in active structural control
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/5ge79t
work_keys_str_mv AT choyenyang researchoftimedelayinactivestructuralcontrol
AT yángzhuōyàn researchoftimedelayinactivestructuralcontrol
AT choyenyang shíjiānyánchíduìzhǔdòngjiégòukòngzhìzhīyánjiū
AT yángzhuōyàn shíjiānyánchíduìzhǔdòngjiégòukòngzhìzhīyánjiū
_version_ 1719096015819112448