On the metatheory of classical propositional logic

碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 哲學所 === 93 === The topic of this thesis is ``On the metatheoy of classical propositional logic". I prove that the metatheory of propositional logic is undecidable, and using one of Turing's result to prove it is also non-axiomatizable. This thesis offers three arguments,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tzu- Keng Fu, 傅子耕
Other Authors: 李國偉
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/86601431532012659596
id ndltd-TW-093CCU05259005
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093CCU052590052017-07-09T04:29:35Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/86601431532012659596 On the metatheory of classical propositional logic Tzu- Keng Fu 傅子耕 碩士 國立中正大學 哲學所 93 The topic of this thesis is ``On the metatheoy of classical propositional logic". I prove that the metatheory of propositional logic is undecidable, and using one of Turing's result to prove it is also non-axiomatizable. This thesis offers three arguments, the first one is to prove $Th(langle vdash angle)$ is decidable, the second one is to prove $Th(langle vdash angle)$ is decidable, and the third one is to prove $Th(PROP)$ is undecidable. From these three proofs, we get the main result of this thesis, and these three proofs can also be three examples for three methods of proving the decidability problems separately. Especially emphasizing, when doing the first two proofs, I refer to some methods in model theory, to use these classical ways, we find it is clear and easy to finish these two proofs. Besides, when doing the third proof, I follow the method that Ian Mason offers in his paper[7]. Although this method can help us derive the result that we want effectively, many details is not clear such that the readers can not realize easily. The other purpose is to make details well-done. 李國偉 李瑞麟 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 42 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 哲學所 === 93 === The topic of this thesis is ``On the metatheoy of classical propositional logic". I prove that the metatheory of propositional logic is undecidable, and using one of Turing's result to prove it is also non-axiomatizable. This thesis offers three arguments, the first one is to prove $Th(langle vdash angle)$ is decidable, the second one is to prove $Th(langle vdash angle)$ is decidable, and the third one is to prove $Th(PROP)$ is undecidable. From these three proofs, we get the main result of this thesis, and these three proofs can also be three examples for three methods of proving the decidability problems separately. Especially emphasizing, when doing the first two proofs, I refer to some methods in model theory, to use these classical ways, we find it is clear and easy to finish these two proofs. Besides, when doing the third proof, I follow the method that Ian Mason offers in his paper[7]. Although this method can help us derive the result that we want effectively, many details is not clear such that the readers can not realize easily. The other purpose is to make details well-done.
author2 李國偉
author_facet 李國偉
Tzu- Keng Fu
傅子耕
author Tzu- Keng Fu
傅子耕
spellingShingle Tzu- Keng Fu
傅子耕
On the metatheory of classical propositional logic
author_sort Tzu- Keng Fu
title On the metatheory of classical propositional logic
title_short On the metatheory of classical propositional logic
title_full On the metatheory of classical propositional logic
title_fullStr On the metatheory of classical propositional logic
title_full_unstemmed On the metatheory of classical propositional logic
title_sort on the metatheory of classical propositional logic
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/86601431532012659596
work_keys_str_mv AT tzukengfu onthemetatheoryofclassicalpropositionallogic
AT fùzigēng onthemetatheoryofclassicalpropositionallogic
_version_ 1718493808207855616