| Summary: | 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 國際事務與戰略研究所 === 92 === After People Republic of China (PRC) established, his national defense thinking had transformed several times follow with international strategic environment changing. The major concerns of PRC’s national defense thinking are national security, territory, sovereignty and Chinese Communist Party interests. The PRC’s government internal leadership characteristic is national ruler’s thinking. The whole national defense, military development and decision-making conduct all depend on the national ruler’s ideology and the ruler himself subjective recognition of national and international strategic environments. That is the key factor of leading national defense strategy development. To review the PRC’s history, the national defense conducted core are surrounding Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin these three leader’s thinking to develop their national defense strategy.
The period of Mao, his national defense core thinking is “People’s War”. His operation conduct highlighted “the protraction and attrition war” defensive strategy.
The period of Deng, although he followed Mao’s “People’s War” military thought. But he coordinated with the strategic environment changing, modified the “People’s War” into the “People’s War under modern conditions”. It also integrated with “Active offensive strategic thought” to resist the enemy out of territory. It became the major national defense strategy thinking of Deng’s leadership.
In post-cold war era, Deng and Jiang leadership their national defense strategy core was achieved national defense modernization. They emphasize on “Quality and Hi-tech military constructions” toward “the top-grade troops doctrine with China’s feature”. Trying to promote the “People’s war” deterrence and combat capabilities to secure the Chinese national interest. So in this era, the PRC’s national security strategy is pursuit the country stability, the domestic economic prosperity and promoting the comprehensive national powers.
Observing the PRC’s leadership, they always control the authority of the political party, government administration and military policy decision-making. Therefore, this dissertation attempt to study these leaders ideology, their subjective acknowledge of strategic environment change, and their difference with strategic viewpoint. From there, I try to find the influential factors and dynamic situation of PRC’s national defensive strategy. Hopefully, to benefit the ROC‘s (Taiwan) national defense and military strength construction to against the PRC’s threats.
|
|---|
