metropolitian city houses moving and social work --

• Main Authors: Su Ying-Chu, 蘇英足
• Other Authors: Pi-Hua Chao
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2004
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/34819562347234042995

碩士 === 東吳大學 === 社會工作學系 === 92 === Abstract For a metropolis, the development of public institution, for example parks, is crucial subject, whether for the growth of economy or the rise of living standard. In the process of urban development, the government has no choice to demolish the original building and institution. However, the process of demolishing faces much difficulty in recent years, including severe resistatnce of the residence. The government was forced to spend much time in planning to get consensus. In order to minimize the discontent of the residents and collect their opinions, social workers are assigned to take part in the demolishing process, and are expected to facilitate the completion of the process by using their professional communicating skills. The methodology of this research is qualitative approach. The author used in-depth interview skill to interview with eleven social workers who ever took part in demolishing cases to understand their roles in the process and how they see their own role. Furthermore, the author could analyze if there are conflicts between their roles and social work professional autonomy, and the reflective thinking of social workers. The conclusion of this research are as follows： (1) Professionalism are related to both age and working years. (2) People who work with different target groups will have different points of view. (3) There are certain viewpoint gaps between policy-makers and first-line workers in “professionalism”. (4) The arrangement inside bureaucratic system induces the limitation of professionalism. (5) Social workers are not given a “clear-defined ” role in the whole deconstruction process.