立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 新聞研究所 === 92 === The program of the transference of The Legislative Yuan has lasted for fourteen years and has not completed. The budget of the program was cancelled once because the public was opposed of it. There were also lots of rumors surrounding this program, such as corrup...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2003
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58615172103712136995 |
id |
ndltd-TW-092NTU00383006 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-092NTU003830062015-10-13T13:27:34Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58615172103712136995 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 Lee, Cheng-ching 李政青 碩士 國立臺灣大學 新聞研究所 92 The program of the transference of The Legislative Yuan has lasted for fourteen years and has not completed. The budget of the program was cancelled once because the public was opposed of it. There were also lots of rumors surrounding this program, such as corruption. Those rumors let more people question the necessary of the transference. For those questions and obstruction, until now, the new building of The Legislative Yuan does not really start. So, should The Legislative Yuan have a new building for itself? Why there are so many opposite opinion toward the program? Does this situation have any connection with the legislator’ image and behavior? Mainly, what kind of parliament culture is reflected in the progress of this program? 周陽山 徐梅屏 2003 學位論文 ; thesis 70 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 新聞研究所 === 92 === The program of the transference of The Legislative Yuan has lasted for fourteen years and has not completed. The budget of the program was cancelled once because the public was opposed of it. There were also lots of rumors surrounding this program, such as corruption. Those rumors let more people question the necessary of the transference. For those questions and obstruction, until now, the new building of The Legislative Yuan does not really start.
So, should The Legislative Yuan have a new building for itself? Why there are so many opposite opinion toward the program? Does this situation have any connection with the legislator’ image and behavior? Mainly, what kind of parliament culture is reflected in the progress of this program?
|
author2 |
周陽山 |
author_facet |
周陽山 Lee, Cheng-ching 李政青 |
author |
Lee, Cheng-ching 李政青 |
spellingShingle |
Lee, Cheng-ching 李政青 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 |
author_sort |
Lee, Cheng-ching |
title |
立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 |
title_short |
立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 |
title_full |
立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 |
title_fullStr |
立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 |
title_full_unstemmed |
立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 |
title_sort |
立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 |
publishDate |
2003 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58615172103712136995 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT leechengching lìfǎyuànqiānjiànjìhuàshísìniándezhuǎnzhéyǔyuǎnjǐng AT lǐzhèngqīng lìfǎyuànqiānjiànjìhuàshísìniándezhuǎnzhéyǔyuǎnjǐng |
_version_ |
1717736138001612800 |