立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 新聞研究所 === 92 === The program of the transference of The Legislative Yuan has lasted for fourteen years and has not completed. The budget of the program was cancelled once because the public was opposed of it. There were also lots of rumors surrounding this program, such as corrup...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Cheng-ching, 李政青
Other Authors: 周陽山
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2003
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58615172103712136995
id ndltd-TW-092NTU00383006
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-092NTU003830062015-10-13T13:27:34Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58615172103712136995 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景 Lee, Cheng-ching 李政青 碩士 國立臺灣大學 新聞研究所 92 The program of the transference of The Legislative Yuan has lasted for fourteen years and has not completed. The budget of the program was cancelled once because the public was opposed of it. There were also lots of rumors surrounding this program, such as corruption. Those rumors let more people question the necessary of the transference. For those questions and obstruction, until now, the new building of The Legislative Yuan does not really start. So, should The Legislative Yuan have a new building for itself? Why there are so many opposite opinion toward the program? Does this situation have any connection with the legislator’ image and behavior? Mainly, what kind of parliament culture is reflected in the progress of this program? 周陽山 徐梅屏 2003 學位論文 ; thesis 70 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 新聞研究所 === 92 === The program of the transference of The Legislative Yuan has lasted for fourteen years and has not completed. The budget of the program was cancelled once because the public was opposed of it. There were also lots of rumors surrounding this program, such as corruption. Those rumors let more people question the necessary of the transference. For those questions and obstruction, until now, the new building of The Legislative Yuan does not really start. So, should The Legislative Yuan have a new building for itself? Why there are so many opposite opinion toward the program? Does this situation have any connection with the legislator’ image and behavior? Mainly, what kind of parliament culture is reflected in the progress of this program?
author2 周陽山
author_facet 周陽山
Lee, Cheng-ching
李政青
author Lee, Cheng-ching
李政青
spellingShingle Lee, Cheng-ching
李政青
立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景
author_sort Lee, Cheng-ching
title 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景
title_short 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景
title_full 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景
title_fullStr 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景
title_full_unstemmed 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景
title_sort 立法院遷建計畫─十四年的轉折與遠景
publishDate 2003
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58615172103712136995
work_keys_str_mv AT leechengching lìfǎyuànqiānjiànjìhuàshísìniándezhuǎnzhéyǔyuǎnjǐng
AT lǐzhèngqīng lìfǎyuànqiānjiànjìhuàshísìniándezhuǎnzhéyǔyuǎnjǐng
_version_ 1717736138001612800