| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 社會教育學系在職進修碩士班 === 92 === The purpose of this study was to investigate the relations between parents’ intrapersonal intelligence and child-rearing practices. The participants included children and parents from Taipei city and Taipei County. There were five subject under this research：1. To understand the current status of parents’ intrapersonal degree. 2. To Compare the difference of intrapersonal intelligence degree among different SEC. 3.To understand different styles among parents ’child-rearing practice. 4. To compare different social population’ parents'' child-rearing practices. 5. To probe the relationship among parents intrapersonal intelligence and child-rearing practice. This research was adopt “ Parents’ intrapersonal intelligence questionnaire” which designed by Hong （2001） .Furthermore, adopt the ”Parents’ child-rearing practices attitude questionnaire” to understand parents’ child-rearing practice can be classified into: 1. Authority style. 2. Strategy style. 3. Democracy style. The statistical methods used SAS software to analyze the data were analysis of variance, Chi-square test. The results of this study were listed below:
1. Purpose one: to understand parents’ intrapersonal current status:
Tested by “parents’ intrapersonal intelligence questionnaire” The score can be classified into 41-45 point（38%）, 36-40 point （36%）,31-35 point（14%）,46-50（10%）,the mean score were 39.9 point,（SD =4.5），the mean score（39.9） were higher than the average（25）, the result showed most of the parents were high intrapersonal intelligence.
2. Analysis of different social population variables among parents’ intrapersonal intelligence:
Except parents ’occupation, there were no significant differences among different parents’ age, gender, income, educational level, living area in intrapersonal intelligence.
3.The style of different parents’rearing practices:
According to the score of questionnaire frequency distribution showed the authority style of parents’ child-rearing practice was the majority style（74%），the strategy style（13%） and democracy style（13%） were less than authority style.
4. Analysis of different social population variables among parents’ child-rearing practice:
There were no significant difference among different social population variables after Chi-square test.
5. The relationship between parents’ intrapersonal intelligence and child-rearing practice:
There were no significant difference among different parents’ intrapersonal intelligence and child-rearing practice after Chi-square test.
|
|---|
