女男都愛的女性之伴侶抉擇

• Main Authors: Shu-Ching Lee, 李淑敬
• Other Authors: 劉淑慧
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2004
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/76017907659316438574

碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 輔導研究所 === 92 === Mate-choosing of Female who Loves both Female and Male Shu-Ching Lee Abstract The purpose of current research is to understand the psychological process of females who found herself love both females and males, and their choosing connotation and choosing types relative to partnership. Narrative approach was carried to the research. Totally, four research participants were interviewed. The collected data was analyzed in the way of “categorical-content” which was proposed by Lieblich, Tuval-Mashiach and Zilber（1998）. Additionally, in order to get familiar to the experiences and contexts of the interviews, once the summarized segmental text was categorized, it was put back to the holistic context and present to the readers. Therefore, the research results were presented in a holistic way without segmenting the text that collected from interviewees. Finally, a cross-case synthetically discussion and analysis were also carried to the categorized data to draw a conclusion. In the aspect of psychological process, the research found that the females who love both females and males feel embarrassed when challenging traditional dichotomous thinking and situation accommodating. They do not identify themselves in such duality as heterosexuality/homosexuality. However, they still choose their stance between the groups of heterosexuality/homosexuality and develop their own strategies to cope with daily life in such surroundings. They tend to develop a dual life to reduce the critique from society and hence adopt different attitudes toward a dual life which would result in different psychological feelings and adopting. In the aspect of mate-choosing, they tend to judge by love relationship rather than gender. That is, they, perhaps, do not emphasize on identification but feelings toward their mates and the level of attraction to their mates; not gender but the existence of equality and respect in such a reciprocally relationship; not the differences in the social situation between heterosexual mate and homosexual mate but what choice an individual is willing to make and what cost an individual is willing to pay in the social situation. Therefore, in the aspect of choosing type, we may find that they need to adopt a confirmed attitude to treat their decision when they intend to make a not main stream choice. Finally, the researcher illustrated the limits of the current study and introspection in the research process, and provides some advices to the followed research and to guidance and counseling profession.