The Impact study of Human Capotal on Technology Transfer and Technical Progress

• Main Authors: Hui-Wen Lin, 林慧雯
• Other Authors: Grant Gwo-Liang Yang
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2004
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/36404329226314727070

碩士 === 立德管理學院 === 科技管理研究所 === 92 === The inclinationalized industry structure that derives from Taiwan’s Green Silicon Island industrial policy that favors hi-tech industries and overlooks traditional industries is projected onto incubation of human capital, which may leads to further marginalization in traditional industries. In the 21st century of knowledge economy where globalization, privatization, and technology advance at mega speed, effective acquisition of technique is now a crucial mean for business to build and maintain competitive advantage. On the other hand, driven by globalization, a mass fusion of global human capital that has removed national boundaries of employment education and training, and has made reservation and enhancement of human capital international issues. Such development has blurred technique transfer and expansion. Will enhancement of human capital become another major factor of technique advancement? Will absence of boundary in human capital become a major factor of technique transfer? These two issues shall be further explored and discussed in this study. When choosing source of technique, businesses should conduct in-depth self-assessment in human capital for the decision between external acquisition and internal development, as well as technique source-dependent investment direction for human capital enhancement. This study measures influences of business technique transfer and technique advancement from human capital standpoint. This exploratory study intends to review influences brought by human capital on technique transfer and technique advancement from viewpoints of culture and globalization. Results of this study show that attitudes held by Taiwanese and American businesses toward human capital in terms of technique transfer and advancement entirely differ from Japanese businesses. The conclusions are： （1） Personnel turnover does not incur technique expansion that further leads to technique advancement among industry in highly technique monopolized business; （2） Investment of foreign capital in research and development base indicates beginning of personnel knowledge circulation, which may cause technique expansion and trigger related technique advancement domestically; （3） Methods of education and training differ from the alternative of technique transfer, and （4）Human-capital-intensive affects schedule of technology transfer and methods of technology obtained in Photoelectronic Display Industry.