Application of Implicit Finite Difference for Pricing Barrier Options
碩士 === 義守大學 === 財務金融學系 === 92 === Boyle and Lau discovered in 1994 that while evaluating continuous-time barriers option, the binomial tree model will produce big sharp evaluation errors and converge at low speed. In 1995, Ritchken proposed the method of pricing barrier option by using lattice. La...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2004
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01535980938373998873 |
id |
ndltd-TW-092ISU00304009 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-092ISU003040092016-01-04T04:09:17Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01535980938373998873 Application of Implicit Finite Difference for Pricing Barrier Options 隱式有限差分法在界限選擇權定價上之應用 Hung-Ta Tsai 蔡宏達 碩士 義守大學 財務金融學系 92 Boyle and Lau discovered in 1994 that while evaluating continuous-time barriers option, the binomial tree model will produce big sharp evaluation errors and converge at low speed. In 1995, Ritchken proposed the method of pricing barrier option by using lattice. Late it was found the method converged too slow, when the initial underlying asset was close to the barrier. Boyle and Tian in 1998 used the explicit finite difference to determine the price of barrier option. The grid must be adjusted for the barrier pass all of them. However, this method cannot assure the initial underlying asset fall on the grid, nor can it directly obtain the accurate price of barrier option. Therefore, it is necessary to use quadratic interpolation to obtain the accurate price. In order to obtain the price of option directly, it is needed to adjust grids to assure both initial underlying asset and barrier pass the grid and then use implicit finite difference to evaluate the price of continuous-time barrier option. Both single and double barriers are discussed in the article. Numerical result, found by using implicit finite difference to evaluate the price of barrier option, shows the feature of monotone. Richardson extrapolation improves the efficiency and precision of calculation. Even if the price of initial underlying asset is extremely close to the barrier, implicit finite difference can still work properly. Tu-Chung Wu 吳土城 2004 學位論文 ; thesis 44 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 義守大學 === 財務金融學系 === 92 === Boyle and Lau discovered in 1994 that while evaluating continuous-time barriers option, the binomial tree model will produce big sharp evaluation errors and converge at low speed. In 1995, Ritchken proposed the method of pricing barrier option by using lattice. Late it was found the method converged too slow, when the initial underlying asset was close to the barrier. Boyle and Tian in 1998 used the explicit finite difference to determine the price of barrier option. The grid must be adjusted for the barrier pass all of them. However, this method cannot assure the initial underlying asset fall on the grid, nor can it directly obtain the accurate price of barrier option. Therefore, it is necessary to use quadratic interpolation to obtain the accurate price. In order to obtain the price of option directly, it is needed to adjust grids to assure both initial underlying asset and barrier pass the grid and then use implicit finite difference to evaluate the price of continuous-time barrier option. Both single and double barriers are discussed in the article. Numerical result, found by using implicit finite difference to evaluate the price of barrier option, shows the feature of monotone. Richardson extrapolation improves the efficiency and precision of calculation. Even if the price of initial underlying asset is extremely close to the barrier, implicit finite difference can still work properly.
|
author2 |
Tu-Chung Wu |
author_facet |
Tu-Chung Wu Hung-Ta Tsai 蔡宏達 |
author |
Hung-Ta Tsai 蔡宏達 |
spellingShingle |
Hung-Ta Tsai 蔡宏達 Application of Implicit Finite Difference for Pricing Barrier Options |
author_sort |
Hung-Ta Tsai |
title |
Application of Implicit Finite Difference for Pricing Barrier Options |
title_short |
Application of Implicit Finite Difference for Pricing Barrier Options |
title_full |
Application of Implicit Finite Difference for Pricing Barrier Options |
title_fullStr |
Application of Implicit Finite Difference for Pricing Barrier Options |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of Implicit Finite Difference for Pricing Barrier Options |
title_sort |
application of implicit finite difference for pricing barrier options |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01535980938373998873 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hungtatsai applicationofimplicitfinitedifferenceforpricingbarrieroptions AT càihóngdá applicationofimplicitfinitedifferenceforpricingbarrieroptions AT hungtatsai yǐnshìyǒuxiànchàfēnfǎzàijièxiànxuǎnzéquándìngjiàshàngzhīyīngyòng AT càihóngdá yǐnshìyǒuxiànchàfēnfǎzàijièxiànxuǎnzéquándìngjiàshàngzhīyīngyòng |
_version_ |
1718160121688752128 |