On the Current Plebiscite Controversy:
碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 政治學研究所 === 92 === There have been, on the part of the plebiscite, accumulated experiences and fruitful results in the Western advanced democratic countries. Since 1990, seventeen local plebiscites have been held in Taiwan. Reflecting on other countries’ plebiscite systems and Taiwa...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2004
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92011777573733359781 |
id |
ndltd-TW-092CCU00227007 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-092CCU002270072015-10-13T13:39:29Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92011777573733359781 On the Current Plebiscite Controversy: 從比較觀點與過去實踐經驗論我國當前公投爭議 Kuo-Lung Lin 林國龍 碩士 國立中正大學 政治學研究所 92 There have been, on the part of the plebiscite, accumulated experiences and fruitful results in the Western advanced democratic countries. Since 1990, seventeen local plebiscites have been held in Taiwan. Reflecting on other countries’ plebiscite systems and Taiwan’s past experiences, we can make the most of our unique situation to help enhance our countrymen’s political participation and to prevent political conflicts. This is very important and desperately needed. The passing of the plebiscite law is an important milestone of Taiwan’s democratic deepening. However, judging from the continued controversy on the plebiscite, Taiwan must establish a plebiscite mechanism, which can maintain the peaceful development of Cross-Strait relations and sustain the political stability domestically. This indeed, is an important issue for the whole country. 謝敏捷 2004 學位論文 ; thesis 134 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 政治學研究所 === 92 === There have been, on the part of the plebiscite, accumulated experiences and fruitful results in the Western advanced democratic countries. Since 1990, seventeen local plebiscites have been held in Taiwan. Reflecting on other countries’ plebiscite systems and Taiwan’s past experiences, we can make the most of our unique situation to help enhance our countrymen’s political participation and to prevent political conflicts. This is very important and desperately needed. The passing of the plebiscite law is an important milestone of Taiwan’s democratic deepening. However, judging from the continued controversy on the plebiscite, Taiwan must establish a plebiscite mechanism, which can maintain the peaceful development of Cross-Strait relations and sustain the political stability domestically. This indeed, is an important issue for the whole country.
|
author2 |
謝敏捷 |
author_facet |
謝敏捷 Kuo-Lung Lin 林國龍 |
author |
Kuo-Lung Lin 林國龍 |
spellingShingle |
Kuo-Lung Lin 林國龍 On the Current Plebiscite Controversy: |
author_sort |
Kuo-Lung Lin |
title |
On the Current Plebiscite Controversy: |
title_short |
On the Current Plebiscite Controversy: |
title_full |
On the Current Plebiscite Controversy: |
title_fullStr |
On the Current Plebiscite Controversy: |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the Current Plebiscite Controversy: |
title_sort |
on the current plebiscite controversy: |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92011777573733359781 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kuolunglin onthecurrentplebiscitecontroversy AT línguólóng onthecurrentplebiscitecontroversy AT kuolunglin cóngbǐjiàoguāndiǎnyǔguòqùshíjiànjīngyànlùnwǒguódāngqiángōngtóuzhēngyì AT línguólóng cóngbǐjiàoguāndiǎnyǔguòqùshíjiànjīngyànlùnwǒguódāngqiángōngtóuzhēngyì |
_version_ |
1717739773457596416 |