The Study of the Development of Mexico’s Party Politics Since 1988

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 拉丁美洲研究所 === 91 === After the 1988 presidential election, Mexico’s political environment had changed a lot from the PRI’s hegemonic party system to multi-party system (PRI, PAN, PRD). After more than a decade, the political situation became the two parties (PRI, PAN) confront with eac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsao, Hsien-chung, 曹顯中
Other Authors: Tsai, Tung-chieh
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2003
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/52386078516885926264
id ndltd-TW-091TKU00184007
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-091TKU001840072015-10-13T13:35:58Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/52386078516885926264 The Study of the Development of Mexico’s Party Politics Since 1988 一九八八年以來墨西哥政黨政治發展之研究 Tsao, Hsien-chung 曹顯中 碩士 淡江大學 拉丁美洲研究所 91 After the 1988 presidential election, Mexico’s political environment had changed a lot from the PRI’s hegemonic party system to multi-party system (PRI, PAN, PRD). After more than a decade, the political situation became the two parties (PRI, PAN) confront with each other in the 2000 presidential election. Surprisingly, PRI failed the campaign, it’s the first time that PRI became the Opposition since 1929. In terms of theory, whether a country has a mechanism of alternation of regime or not could be considered as an indicator for democracy. Before 2000, Mexico couldn’t be regard as an undemocratic country, nonetheless, we treat it as a democratic country after the 2000 presidential election. With regard to the recent political reform in Mexico, which most remarkable is the electoral reforms. Initially, the election laws and institutions extremely favored the ruling party (PRI), and suppressed the Oppositions, relatively. The process of election was just a nominal form, losing the original sublime meaning of democracy. But under the stress of demanding for democracy from the public, the ruling party finally accepted the appeal to some extend to pacify people’s dissatisfaction. Through reestablishing the game rules, the injustice between all parties could be eliminated. This study is trying to figure out the changing process of Mexico’s modern party system, and to understand the reason why the Mexicans’ voting behavior changed dramatically under such a closed political environment since 1988. Followings are the main purposes of this study I’m trying to exam Mexico through the discussion of democratization and the theory of party system, and thereby to prove the process of democratic transition in Mexico as well as the feedbacks of the political development in the country through the interactions between politic parties. It was based on the electoral system to discuss the possible effects on the party system. In this study, I try to observe the changes of Mexicans’ voting behavior after several electoral system and institutions reforms which is based on the theories of Giovanni Sartori and Maurice Duverger. To observe the political development in Mexico in the foreseeable future through the current situation after the alternation of party, and to analyze how Fox beat Labastida in 2000 presidential election. As for if PRI retake the regime in the next campaign or never be able to recover after the setback. Although PAN beat PRI unprecedented, the real challenge is yet to start. How could PAN cooperate with all the political parties in order to improve the bad economic condition and to lead the people forward to a free, democratic, and wealthy life as well? All these problems are testing the inexperienced Fox administration and PAN. Tsai, Tung-chieh 蔡東杰 2003 學位論文 ; thesis 142 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 拉丁美洲研究所 === 91 === After the 1988 presidential election, Mexico’s political environment had changed a lot from the PRI’s hegemonic party system to multi-party system (PRI, PAN, PRD). After more than a decade, the political situation became the two parties (PRI, PAN) confront with each other in the 2000 presidential election. Surprisingly, PRI failed the campaign, it’s the first time that PRI became the Opposition since 1929. In terms of theory, whether a country has a mechanism of alternation of regime or not could be considered as an indicator for democracy. Before 2000, Mexico couldn’t be regard as an undemocratic country, nonetheless, we treat it as a democratic country after the 2000 presidential election. With regard to the recent political reform in Mexico, which most remarkable is the electoral reforms. Initially, the election laws and institutions extremely favored the ruling party (PRI), and suppressed the Oppositions, relatively. The process of election was just a nominal form, losing the original sublime meaning of democracy. But under the stress of demanding for democracy from the public, the ruling party finally accepted the appeal to some extend to pacify people’s dissatisfaction. Through reestablishing the game rules, the injustice between all parties could be eliminated. This study is trying to figure out the changing process of Mexico’s modern party system, and to understand the reason why the Mexicans’ voting behavior changed dramatically under such a closed political environment since 1988. Followings are the main purposes of this study I’m trying to exam Mexico through the discussion of democratization and the theory of party system, and thereby to prove the process of democratic transition in Mexico as well as the feedbacks of the political development in the country through the interactions between politic parties. It was based on the electoral system to discuss the possible effects on the party system. In this study, I try to observe the changes of Mexicans’ voting behavior after several electoral system and institutions reforms which is based on the theories of Giovanni Sartori and Maurice Duverger. To observe the political development in Mexico in the foreseeable future through the current situation after the alternation of party, and to analyze how Fox beat Labastida in 2000 presidential election. As for if PRI retake the regime in the next campaign or never be able to recover after the setback. Although PAN beat PRI unprecedented, the real challenge is yet to start. How could PAN cooperate with all the political parties in order to improve the bad economic condition and to lead the people forward to a free, democratic, and wealthy life as well? All these problems are testing the inexperienced Fox administration and PAN.
author2 Tsai, Tung-chieh
author_facet Tsai, Tung-chieh
Tsao, Hsien-chung
曹顯中
author Tsao, Hsien-chung
曹顯中
spellingShingle Tsao, Hsien-chung
曹顯中
The Study of the Development of Mexico’s Party Politics Since 1988
author_sort Tsao, Hsien-chung
title The Study of the Development of Mexico’s Party Politics Since 1988
title_short The Study of the Development of Mexico’s Party Politics Since 1988
title_full The Study of the Development of Mexico’s Party Politics Since 1988
title_fullStr The Study of the Development of Mexico’s Party Politics Since 1988
title_full_unstemmed The Study of the Development of Mexico’s Party Politics Since 1988
title_sort study of the development of mexico’s party politics since 1988
publishDate 2003
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/52386078516885926264
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaohsienchung thestudyofthedevelopmentofmexicospartypoliticssince1988
AT cáoxiǎnzhōng thestudyofthedevelopmentofmexicospartypoliticssince1988
AT tsaohsienchung yījiǔbābāniányǐláimòxīgēzhèngdǎngzhèngzhìfāzhǎnzhīyánjiū
AT cáoxiǎnzhōng yījiǔbābāniányǐláimòxīgēzhèngdǎngzhèngzhìfāzhǎnzhīyánjiū
AT tsaohsienchung studyofthedevelopmentofmexicospartypoliticssince1988
AT cáoxiǎnzhōng studyofthedevelopmentofmexicospartypoliticssince1988
_version_ 1717738478035271680