A Study on Construction for Evaluation Indicatorsof Interior Design 3D Computer Graphic inVocational Senior High School Students

• Main Authors: Tasi, Shiu-Chyuan, 蔡須全
• Other Authors: Lin, Hui-Liang
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2003
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/82637864347033814176

碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 創新設計研究所 === 91 === This purpose of this study is to construct the evaluation indicators of 3D computer graphic for senior high school students, due to providing some references for both teaching and studying. The discussion of this thesis based on documents and wants to build a theoretical base for interior design 3D computer graphic. Moreover, by interviewing with interior designers and teachers, a specific questionnaire is deduced and taken by 127 teachers and interior designers. The conclusions and recommendation go as below: 1﹒The evaluation indicators can be categorized as 5 levels: "unity", "object model", "picture posting", "lighting", and "creativity" with 40 indicators. 2﹒Among all study objects, lighting is the most important level. The object model is the least one. 3﹒In teachers'' opinion, creativity is the most important level. The object model is the least one. 4﹒In interior designers'' opinion, picture posting is the most important level. The object model is the least one 5﹒It occurs to all objects of study among 40 evaluation indicators that the unity of a case, the color harmony, and the spatial grading are the most important ones. 6﹒In the teachers'' opinion, they set priorities on the unity of a case, the accordance of the title, and the sense of colors. 7﹒In the interior designers'' opinion, aesthetic, the sense of colors, and the location of lighting are the most important evaluation indicators among 40. 8﹒The degree of seniority makes differences in the level of evaluations. For those who have more than 16 years seniority, unity, object model, and picture posting are more important than those under 16 years. 9﹒The locus of all study objects suggests the difference of importance on the evaluation level. Those who stay in the south have higher evaluation than those in the north. 10﹒The 5 evaluation indicators which teachers apprized most isted below : ( 2) the unity of a case (22) the accordance of the title (30) the sense of colors (31) the spatial grading (37) extraordinary ideas 11﹒In aspect of teaching, teachers emphasize on creativity specifically, then on lighting which is also apprized by all study objects, and finally on the picture posting apprized by interior designers. 12﹒The seniority makes difference on the importance evaluation of the individual indicators. Teachers can adjust the distribution of the different indicators by the aim of evaluation.