Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 技術及職業教育研究所 === 91 === The purpose of this study is to construct the indictors of quality of work life for the elementary and junior high schools teachers, and to evaluate the weight systems of these indicators. This study will be useful to make and execute educational policy in the future.
First, based on the literature review and theory, this study constructed the original indictors and system; then, by using a questionnaire this study survey the important indictors of teachers’ quality of work life. On the other side, based on the findings of first step, the hierarchical structure of these indicators was constructed and also its important weightings were evaluated by fourteen experts. Finally, statistical techniques used are described statistic and Analytic Hierarchy Process.
The findings of this study were as follows:
1. For the elementary and junior high schools teachers, their quality of work life indictors are structured into three levels. There are four indictors in the first level, include “personal expectancy”, “organizational structure”, “working assignment” and “working environment”. Then there are eleven indictors in the second level, and the third level of the structure has thirty-one indictors.
2. In the first level of the hierarchical structure of the teachers’ quality of work life, “personal expectancy” is the most weighed ratio. The second level of the structure has eleven indictors which are individually the most important, included “school climate”, “administrative motion”, “working responsibility” and “organizational identification” . In the third level, the most important indictors are “colleague relationship”, “channel of communication”, “working distribution ” and “responsibility allotment ”
|