| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 公共行政暨政策學系 === 91 === In the past two decades, privatization has become a trend in the world. Taiwan government also devoted to improve privatization policy since 1989. In order to improve this policy, Taiwan has tried hard to open market and encourage private-sector participation.
However, some state-run enterprises still dominate government monopolies, such as petroleum, electricity, telecommunications and so on. Taiwan government should modify the role to liberalize or commission to private sector. Also, Taiwan should revise present laws in order to lay a solid legal basis for private-sector participation. After privatization, the management of public shares has become more important.
Now surplus public shares are distributed and dominated in different ministries or commissions, such us Ministry of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, Veterans Affairs Commission and so on. Some management difficulties may occur in this situation. According to the common views of the Economic Development Committee in 2001, the Executive Yuan established the National Property Executive Committee to work on the jobs of privatization and impose discipline in financial markets in 2002. Even so, the National Property Bureau, Economic Planning and Development Council and the other committees, also have authority for privatization.
Therefore, this study is aimed at the system of state-run enterprises management, public shares management after privatization, and the stage of management organization of public shares. In order to establish a mechanism to manage pubic shares, we adopted AHP concept to structure this study. We used questionnaire survey for the experts by Snowball Sampling. Setting up three criterions of decision as below: 1.Raising the efficiency of resource allocation. 2.Accelerating the privatization of state-run enterprises. 3.Concentrating the authority of organization management. Also, we design three alternatives of decision. The results show that the alternative of “Distribute then Concentrate” is the first priority.
|
|---|
