| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立體育學院 === 體育研究所 === 91 === The purposes of the present study were to examine 1. the influence of sexual type and achievement goal orientation on causal attribution and emotional response while winning; 2.
the influence of sexual type and achievement goal orientation on causal attribution and emotional response while losing. This study recruited 422 athletes including high school table tennis players who competed in 2002 youth elite competition and judo and tae kwon do athletes who competed in 2003 National High School Sports Event（males =219; females=203) with mean age of 16.60(±1.11). Participants completed Causal Dimension Scale II (CDSII) and Emotional Responses Scale, Achievement Goal Orientation Scale, Sexual Type Scale after competition. Independent two-way ANOVA statistical analyses were conducted. The result showed that:
1.There’s no interaction among sexual type, achievement orientation and casual attribution, however, there’s difference on main effect while winning.
(1)There’s significant difference between sexual types on the subscale “stability.” Differential ones were higher than non-differential ones.
(2)There’s no significant difference between different achievement goal orientation and the four subscales of causal attribution.
2.There’s no interaction among sexual type, achievement orientation and positive and negative emotional responses, however, there’s difference on main effect while winning.
(1)There’s significant difference between sexual types on positive emotional responses. Muscular ones were higher than non-differential ones.
(2)There’s no significant difference between different achievement goal orientations on emotional responses.
3.There’s no interaction among sexual type, achievement orientation and casual attribution, however, there’s difference on main effect while losing.
(1)There’s significant difference between sexual types on the subscale of casual attribution “stability.” heterosexuals ones attributed more to stability than famine ones while losing.
(2)There’s no significant difference between different achievement goal orientations on casual attribution.
4.There’s significant interaction among heterosexuals, low-task low ego achievement orientation group and positive emotional responses while losing.
(1)In the low-task low ego group, the heterosexual group was found higher than muscular, famine, and non-differential.
(2)On the sexual type of heterosexual, the positive emotion was found to be significantly higher in low-task low-ego group than high-ego low-task group and high-task high ego group.
(3)On main effect, there’s significant difference between sexual types on positive emotional responses. Heterosexuals were higher than muscular, famine, and non-differential ones.
(4)There’s no significant difference between achievement goal orientations on positive and negative emotional responses.
Thus, it’s suggested that when conducting researches on the relationship between achievement goal orientation and other psychological structures in sports setting, the related factors, like self-efficacy, anxiety, ethics, and flight behaviors should be taken in consideration too.
|
|---|
