Dualism and Cultural Hybridity in Rudyard Kipling''s Kim

碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 外國語文學系碩博士班 === 91 === As an imperialist writer, Kipling’s childhood sojourn in India caused a “double vision” in his works and raised controversy from post-colonial critics. Edward Said, a post-colonial critic, thinks of white writers like Kipling as an “imperial agent” of the Brit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pei-yi Su, 蘇佩儀
Other Authors: Rufus Cook
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2003
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58621197498967900779
id ndltd-TW-091NCKU5094009
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-091NCKU50940092015-10-13T17:06:59Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58621197498967900779 Dualism and Cultural Hybridity in Rudyard Kipling''s Kim 盧得雅‧吉卜齡小說《金姆》中的二元論述及文化交雜 Pei-yi Su 蘇佩儀 碩士 國立成功大學 外國語文學系碩博士班 91 As an imperialist writer, Kipling’s childhood sojourn in India caused a “double vision” in his works and raised controversy from post-colonial critics. Edward Said, a post-colonial critic, thinks of white writers like Kipling as an “imperial agent” of the British Empire as well as a jingoist who assists in passing on racism. Kipling’s Oriental stereotypes and his characterization of “benevolent despots” who recruit dissidence of the colonized by racial tolerance raised the so-called “The Kipling Controversy.” Through the Kipling controversy, this paper aims to discover how the two cultural hybrids in Kipling’s Kim demonstrates but challenges Said’s political interpretations and how they match “the mimic man” that the post-colonial critic Homi Bhabha proposes. In chapter one, Robert Young’s theory of “hybridity” is adopted to explain how the binary opposition of nature and culture reveals Kipling’s ambivalence towards Indianness and Englishness. In chapter two I focus on how Kipling juxtaposes the two cultural hybrids, Kim and Hurree Babu, in order to balance the power relationship between the ruler and the ruled. In chapter three, I mainly discuss the identity crisis of cultural hybrids, showing how Kipling tries to seek resolutions for colonial conflicts through Kim’s identity crisis. In chapter four, Homi Bhabha’s “The third space” is compared to Kipling’s “middle way,” uncovering both the political and the metaphysical sides of “cultural hybridity.” Through Kipling’s concept of cultural hybridity and dualism, on the one hand, we are informed that identity can be constructed for political use; on the other hand, we are also reminded that identity can be redefined metaphysically. Chapter five is a brief conclusion, summing up how Kipling’s concept of “cultural hybridity” lays the foundation of dualism in Kim and explores new ways of thinking for colonial literature. Rufus Cook 柯克 2003 學位論文 ; thesis 97 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 外國語文學系碩博士班 === 91 === As an imperialist writer, Kipling’s childhood sojourn in India caused a “double vision” in his works and raised controversy from post-colonial critics. Edward Said, a post-colonial critic, thinks of white writers like Kipling as an “imperial agent” of the British Empire as well as a jingoist who assists in passing on racism. Kipling’s Oriental stereotypes and his characterization of “benevolent despots” who recruit dissidence of the colonized by racial tolerance raised the so-called “The Kipling Controversy.” Through the Kipling controversy, this paper aims to discover how the two cultural hybrids in Kipling’s Kim demonstrates but challenges Said’s political interpretations and how they match “the mimic man” that the post-colonial critic Homi Bhabha proposes. In chapter one, Robert Young’s theory of “hybridity” is adopted to explain how the binary opposition of nature and culture reveals Kipling’s ambivalence towards Indianness and Englishness. In chapter two I focus on how Kipling juxtaposes the two cultural hybrids, Kim and Hurree Babu, in order to balance the power relationship between the ruler and the ruled. In chapter three, I mainly discuss the identity crisis of cultural hybrids, showing how Kipling tries to seek resolutions for colonial conflicts through Kim’s identity crisis. In chapter four, Homi Bhabha’s “The third space” is compared to Kipling’s “middle way,” uncovering both the political and the metaphysical sides of “cultural hybridity.” Through Kipling’s concept of cultural hybridity and dualism, on the one hand, we are informed that identity can be constructed for political use; on the other hand, we are also reminded that identity can be redefined metaphysically. Chapter five is a brief conclusion, summing up how Kipling’s concept of “cultural hybridity” lays the foundation of dualism in Kim and explores new ways of thinking for colonial literature.
author2 Rufus Cook
author_facet Rufus Cook
Pei-yi Su
蘇佩儀
author Pei-yi Su
蘇佩儀
spellingShingle Pei-yi Su
蘇佩儀
Dualism and Cultural Hybridity in Rudyard Kipling''s Kim
author_sort Pei-yi Su
title Dualism and Cultural Hybridity in Rudyard Kipling''s Kim
title_short Dualism and Cultural Hybridity in Rudyard Kipling''s Kim
title_full Dualism and Cultural Hybridity in Rudyard Kipling''s Kim
title_fullStr Dualism and Cultural Hybridity in Rudyard Kipling''s Kim
title_full_unstemmed Dualism and Cultural Hybridity in Rudyard Kipling''s Kim
title_sort dualism and cultural hybridity in rudyard kipling''s kim
publishDate 2003
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58621197498967900779
work_keys_str_mv AT peiyisu dualismandculturalhybridityinrudyardkiplingskim
AT sūpèiyí dualismandculturalhybridityinrudyardkiplingskim
AT peiyisu lúdéyǎjíbolíngxiǎoshuōjīnmǔzhōngdeèryuánlùnshùjíwénhuàjiāozá
AT sūpèiyí lúdéyǎjíbolíngxiǎoshuōjīnmǔzhōngdeèryuánlùnshùjíwénhuàjiāozá
_version_ 1717780007292502016