The Improvement and Evaluation Model for New Products'' Manufacturing System
碩士 === 元智大學 === 工業工程與管理學系 === 90 === In order to engage in the fast economic environment change and industry-wise growth, manufacturing companies must transform themselves quick enough into high profit and efficiency ones through high value-added products developing with heavy R&D efforts during...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2002
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/75776799426185182323 |
id |
ndltd-TW-090YZU00031050 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-090YZU000310502017-06-02T04:42:05Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/75776799426185182323 The Improvement and Evaluation Model for New Products'' Manufacturing System 新產品量產之生產系統改善與評估模式 Lu, Tsung Chieh 呂聰傑 碩士 元智大學 工業工程與管理學系 90 In order to engage in the fast economic environment change and industry-wise growth, manufacturing companies must transform themselves quick enough into high profit and efficiency ones through high value-added products developing with heavy R&D efforts during new product development (NPD) processes. However, in the post R&D stage, the key concern is that how the production division can pick up the already developed technologies from R&D and implement them into the mass production stage smoothly with high throughputs and effectiveness. Due to the new products’ production systems are initially designed by R&D engineers whom without real mass production experience, there are always some problems taking place between the R&D transferring process to mass production lead-in period. As a result, the low productivity and flexibility occurred during the early mass production stage. The purpose of this research is to solve the above problems by an improved 2-phase integrated model referring as DBR scheduling and rationalizing the production processes to improve the new production system’s effectiveness. By implementing my proposed method, there will be some productivity, flexibility and quality index evaluated by system simulation, and team discussion and brainstorming. In this research, there are 2 examples applied in the integrated improvement model. After 2-phase improvement, the productivity index raised 373% and 22%, and the flexibility index raised 121.1% and 59.2% respectively; for the quality index, the yield is same as original but the product’s “no-good” probability decreased 26.5% and 19.6% respectively. Yuan-Jye Tseng 鄭元杰 2002 學位論文 ; thesis 147 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 元智大學 === 工業工程與管理學系 === 90 === In order to engage in the fast economic environment change and industry-wise growth, manufacturing companies must transform themselves quick enough into high profit and efficiency ones through high value-added products developing with heavy R&D efforts during new product development (NPD) processes. However, in the post R&D stage, the key concern is that how the production division can pick up the already developed technologies from R&D and implement them into the mass production stage smoothly with high throughputs and effectiveness. Due to the new products’ production systems are initially designed by R&D engineers whom without real mass production experience, there are always some problems taking place between the R&D transferring process to mass production lead-in period. As a result, the low productivity and flexibility occurred during the early mass production stage.
The purpose of this research is to solve the above problems by an improved 2-phase integrated model referring as DBR scheduling and rationalizing the production processes to improve the new production system’s effectiveness. By implementing my proposed method, there will be some productivity, flexibility and quality index evaluated by system simulation, and team discussion and brainstorming. In this research, there are 2 examples applied in the integrated improvement model. After 2-phase improvement, the productivity index raised 373% and 22%, and the flexibility index raised 121.1% and 59.2% respectively; for the quality index, the yield is same as original but the product’s “no-good” probability decreased 26.5% and 19.6% respectively.
|
author2 |
Yuan-Jye Tseng |
author_facet |
Yuan-Jye Tseng Lu, Tsung Chieh 呂聰傑 |
author |
Lu, Tsung Chieh 呂聰傑 |
spellingShingle |
Lu, Tsung Chieh 呂聰傑 The Improvement and Evaluation Model for New Products'' Manufacturing System |
author_sort |
Lu, Tsung Chieh |
title |
The Improvement and Evaluation Model for New Products'' Manufacturing System |
title_short |
The Improvement and Evaluation Model for New Products'' Manufacturing System |
title_full |
The Improvement and Evaluation Model for New Products'' Manufacturing System |
title_fullStr |
The Improvement and Evaluation Model for New Products'' Manufacturing System |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Improvement and Evaluation Model for New Products'' Manufacturing System |
title_sort |
improvement and evaluation model for new products'' manufacturing system |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/75776799426185182323 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lutsungchieh theimprovementandevaluationmodelfornewproductsmanufacturingsystem AT lǚcōngjié theimprovementandevaluationmodelfornewproductsmanufacturingsystem AT lutsungchieh xīnchǎnpǐnliàngchǎnzhīshēngchǎnxìtǒnggǎishànyǔpínggūmóshì AT lǚcōngjié xīnchǎnpǐnliàngchǎnzhīshēngchǎnxìtǒnggǎishànyǔpínggūmóshì AT lutsungchieh improvementandevaluationmodelfornewproductsmanufacturingsystem AT lǚcōngjié improvementandevaluationmodelfornewproductsmanufacturingsystem |
_version_ |
1718454450308251648 |