The Holy Idiot Archetype: Madness as a Metaphor for Sanity in Twentieth-Century Drama and Film
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 西洋語文研究所 === 90 === This thesis demonstrates the holy idiot archetype as a major mythical pattern in twentieth-century artistic dramatic creations, through the examples of Luigi Pirandello’s Henry IV, Jean Giraudoux’s The Madwoman of Chaillot, Peter Barnes’ The Ruling Class...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2002
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/63988423771305067400 |
id |
ndltd-TW-090TKU00154002 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-090TKU001540022016-06-24T04:14:44Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/63988423771305067400 The Holy Idiot Archetype: Madness as a Metaphor for Sanity in Twentieth-Century Drama and Film 神聖愚人的典型:以瘋狂喑喻神智清醒之二十世紀戲劇及影片 Lin, Yi-Rung 林宜蓉 碩士 淡江大學 西洋語文研究所 90 This thesis demonstrates the holy idiot archetype as a major mythical pattern in twentieth-century artistic dramatic creations, through the examples of Luigi Pirandello’s Henry IV, Jean Giraudoux’s The Madwoman of Chaillot, Peter Barnes’ The Ruling Class and Philippe De Broca’s film King of Hearts. Utilizing Nietzsche’s, Kierkegaard’s and Heidegger’s philosophical discourses on modes of existence and their analyses on the dialectics of spirituality and worldliness, together with Foucault’s historical research on the treatment of madness, I try to analyze the implications attached to sanity and insanity as presented in the above-mentioned dramatic works. Madness, through dramatization, is romanticized and transformed into a kind of divine madness or holy idiocy that embodies innocence, love, care, conscience and spirituality. On the contrary, normality is ridiculed and defined as synonymous with materialism, hostility, competition, malice and evil. The intentional reversal of the manifestations of sanity as evil and insanity as benevolence functions in these dramatic works in a Jungian manner, as a collective unconscious compensation for the dominant social valorization of material possession, competition, aggression and shrewdness. Through the sublimation of aesthetic form, the dramatists manage to expose problems of normality and provoke a reconsideration of the kind of divine madness and holy idiocy that demonstrate love, care and conscience. Thomas Price 卜萊士 2002 學位論文 ; thesis 110 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 西洋語文研究所 === 90 === This thesis demonstrates the holy idiot archetype as a major mythical pattern in twentieth-century artistic dramatic creations, through the examples of Luigi Pirandello’s Henry IV, Jean Giraudoux’s The Madwoman of Chaillot, Peter Barnes’ The Ruling Class and Philippe De Broca’s film King of Hearts. Utilizing Nietzsche’s, Kierkegaard’s and Heidegger’s philosophical discourses on modes of existence and their analyses on the dialectics of spirituality and worldliness, together with Foucault’s historical research on the treatment of madness, I try to analyze the implications attached to sanity and insanity as presented in the above-mentioned dramatic works. Madness, through dramatization, is romanticized and transformed into a kind of divine madness or holy idiocy that embodies innocence, love, care, conscience and spirituality. On the contrary, normality is ridiculed and defined as synonymous with materialism, hostility, competition, malice and evil. The intentional reversal of the manifestations of sanity as evil and insanity as benevolence functions in these dramatic works in a Jungian manner, as a collective unconscious compensation for the dominant social valorization of material possession, competition, aggression and shrewdness. Through the sublimation of aesthetic form, the dramatists manage to expose problems of normality and provoke a reconsideration of the kind of divine madness and holy idiocy that demonstrate love, care and conscience.
|
author2 |
Thomas Price |
author_facet |
Thomas Price Lin, Yi-Rung 林宜蓉 |
author |
Lin, Yi-Rung 林宜蓉 |
spellingShingle |
Lin, Yi-Rung 林宜蓉 The Holy Idiot Archetype: Madness as a Metaphor for Sanity in Twentieth-Century Drama and Film |
author_sort |
Lin, Yi-Rung |
title |
The Holy Idiot Archetype: Madness as a Metaphor for Sanity in Twentieth-Century Drama and Film |
title_short |
The Holy Idiot Archetype: Madness as a Metaphor for Sanity in Twentieth-Century Drama and Film |
title_full |
The Holy Idiot Archetype: Madness as a Metaphor for Sanity in Twentieth-Century Drama and Film |
title_fullStr |
The Holy Idiot Archetype: Madness as a Metaphor for Sanity in Twentieth-Century Drama and Film |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Holy Idiot Archetype: Madness as a Metaphor for Sanity in Twentieth-Century Drama and Film |
title_sort |
holy idiot archetype: madness as a metaphor for sanity in twentieth-century drama and film |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/63988423771305067400 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT linyirung theholyidiotarchetypemadnessasametaphorforsanityintwentiethcenturydramaandfilm AT línyíróng theholyidiotarchetypemadnessasametaphorforsanityintwentiethcenturydramaandfilm AT linyirung shénshèngyúréndediǎnxíngyǐfēngkuángyīnyùshénzhìqīngxǐngzhīèrshíshìjìxìjùjíyǐngpiàn AT línyíróng shénshèngyúréndediǎnxíngyǐfēngkuángyīnyùshénzhìqīngxǐngzhīèrshíshìjìxìjùjíyǐngpiàn AT linyirung holyidiotarchetypemadnessasametaphorforsanityintwentiethcenturydramaandfilm AT línyíróng holyidiotarchetypemadnessasametaphorforsanityintwentiethcenturydramaandfilm |
_version_ |
1718320907793989632 |