Research of Event Risk in Taiwan Financial Market

碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 會計研究所 === 90 === In 1988, the Bank for International Settlement’s Subcommittee on Banking Super-vision mentioned risk-based capital adequacy requirements, it suggested financial insti-tution should use VaR (value at risk) to measure risk, but VaR may not predict extreme loss condit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I-chun Yuan, 袁懿君
Other Authors: Dai-bai Shen
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2002
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00614770937829909189
id ndltd-TW-090PCCU0385013
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-090PCCU03850132015-10-13T14:41:24Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00614770937829909189 Research of Event Risk in Taiwan Financial Market 我國金融市場事件風險之研究 I-chun Yuan 袁懿君 碩士 中國文化大學 會計研究所 90 In 1988, the Bank for International Settlement’s Subcommittee on Banking Super-vision mentioned risk-based capital adequacy requirements, it suggested financial insti-tution should use VaR (value at risk) to measure risk, but VaR may not predict extreme loss condition which like it can’t measure event risk. As a result, financial institutions should conduct regular stress test, and this concept gradually be valued by most people, besides, we expected financial institution can use stress test to evaluated its ability to absorb loss . This research first put pressure event in order and then use the company’s portfolio to estimate daily VaR and back test . According to the backing test result, we use tradi-tional stress test to examine that when the market suffered huge loss, whether stress test value is good than VaR ? In the end, we find that when the company have loss, traditional stress value is good than VaR and it can protect actual loss. Besides, we also find if the company only use limited scenarios to conduct stress test, it still can’t avoid huge loss effectively Dai-bai Shen 沈大白 2002 學位論文 ; thesis 0 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 會計研究所 === 90 === In 1988, the Bank for International Settlement’s Subcommittee on Banking Super-vision mentioned risk-based capital adequacy requirements, it suggested financial insti-tution should use VaR (value at risk) to measure risk, but VaR may not predict extreme loss condition which like it can’t measure event risk. As a result, financial institutions should conduct regular stress test, and this concept gradually be valued by most people, besides, we expected financial institution can use stress test to evaluated its ability to absorb loss . This research first put pressure event in order and then use the company’s portfolio to estimate daily VaR and back test . According to the backing test result, we use tradi-tional stress test to examine that when the market suffered huge loss, whether stress test value is good than VaR ? In the end, we find that when the company have loss, traditional stress value is good than VaR and it can protect actual loss. Besides, we also find if the company only use limited scenarios to conduct stress test, it still can’t avoid huge loss effectively
author2 Dai-bai Shen
author_facet Dai-bai Shen
I-chun Yuan
袁懿君
author I-chun Yuan
袁懿君
spellingShingle I-chun Yuan
袁懿君
Research of Event Risk in Taiwan Financial Market
author_sort I-chun Yuan
title Research of Event Risk in Taiwan Financial Market
title_short Research of Event Risk in Taiwan Financial Market
title_full Research of Event Risk in Taiwan Financial Market
title_fullStr Research of Event Risk in Taiwan Financial Market
title_full_unstemmed Research of Event Risk in Taiwan Financial Market
title_sort research of event risk in taiwan financial market
publishDate 2002
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00614770937829909189
work_keys_str_mv AT ichunyuan researchofeventriskintaiwanfinancialmarket
AT yuányìjūn researchofeventriskintaiwanfinancialmarket
AT ichunyuan wǒguójīnróngshìchǎngshìjiànfēngxiǎnzhīyánjiū
AT yuányìjūn wǒguójīnróngshìchǎngshìjiànfēngxiǎnzhīyánjiū
_version_ 1717756695451533312