以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探
碩士 === 國立花蓮師範學院 === 國民教育研究所 === 90 === This research is reviewing the existing approach of budgeting education expenses in Taiwan and deliberating upon the system of education adequacy in the U.S. Thus trying to find out the niche resolution for deciding on the education adequacy in Taiwan which can...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2002
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/84729411243943640394 |
id |
ndltd-TW-090NHLTC576002 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-090NHLTC5760022015-10-13T10:18:04Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/84729411243943640394 以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探 涂巧玲 碩士 國立花蓮師範學院 國民教育研究所 90 This research is reviewing the existing approach of budgeting education expenses in Taiwan and deliberating upon the system of education adequacy in the U.S. Thus trying to find out the niche resolution for deciding on the education adequacy in Taiwan which can be adopted as the basis of allocating educational budget. The conceptual framework of this research comes from literatural eviews. It clearly shows that Experts’ Judgement Aapproach can allow people to fully understand the reasons of determining educational expense. Besides, it is specifically appropriate to areas without a standardized accomplishment test. As the result, we decided to modify Experts’ Judgement Approach, considering domestic experts’ opinions collected by Delphi questionnaires, to the method best appropriately determine education adequacy expense in Taiwan. There are seven procedures included in this research: Step 1: Constitute one group of consultants and two groups of educational experts. Step 2: The consultants submit the educational budget principle so that the experts may refer and design them for primary school. Step 3: In accordance with necessity resource components and amount, the consultant group can aggregate the student’s individual cost. Step 4: Adjust the cost according to the characters of student’s and area’s diversity. Step 5: Adjust as per the scale of diseconomy. Step 6: Adjust according to the index of price. Step 7: Through the steps above, at length, I might possibly obtain the formula: The individual cost of each student multiple the number of the students which consider the average need of the general students plus the extra need of the handicap students. Then add in the adjustments of area differences, the adjustments of diseconomy scale, and then the adjustments of price indicators. Key words: Educational Expense, Financial Adequacy, Elementary School 許添明 2002 學位論文 ; thesis 277 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立花蓮師範學院 === 國民教育研究所 === 90 === This research is reviewing the existing approach of budgeting education expenses in Taiwan and deliberating upon the system of education adequacy in the U.S. Thus trying to find out the niche resolution for deciding on the education adequacy in Taiwan which can be adopted as the basis of allocating educational budget.
The conceptual framework of this research comes from literatural eviews. It clearly shows that Experts’ Judgement Aapproach can allow people to fully understand the reasons of determining educational expense. Besides, it is specifically appropriate to areas without a standardized accomplishment test. As the result, we decided to modify Experts’ Judgement Approach, considering domestic experts’ opinions collected by Delphi questionnaires, to the method best appropriately determine education adequacy expense in Taiwan.
There are seven procedures included in this research:
Step 1: Constitute one group of consultants and two groups of educational
experts.
Step 2: The consultants submit the educational budget principle so that the experts may refer and design them for primary school.
Step 3: In accordance with necessity resource components and amount, the consultant group can aggregate the student’s individual cost.
Step 4: Adjust the cost according to the characters of student’s and area’s diversity.
Step 5: Adjust as per the scale of diseconomy.
Step 6: Adjust according to the index of price.
Step 7: Through the steps above, at length, I might possibly obtain the formula: The individual cost of each student multiple the number of the students which consider the average need of the general students plus the extra need of the handicap students. Then add in the adjustments of area differences, the adjustments of diseconomy scale, and then the adjustments of price indicators.
Key words: Educational Expense, Financial Adequacy, Elementary School
|
author2 |
許添明 |
author_facet |
許添明 涂巧玲 |
author |
涂巧玲 |
spellingShingle |
涂巧玲 以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探 |
author_sort |
涂巧玲 |
title |
以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探 |
title_short |
以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探 |
title_full |
以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探 |
title_fullStr |
以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探 |
title_full_unstemmed |
以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探 |
title_sort |
以專家判斷法決定國民小學教育經費充足---一個方法的試探 |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/84729411243943640394 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT túqiǎolíng yǐzhuānjiāpànduànfǎjuédìngguómínxiǎoxuéjiàoyùjīngfèichōngzúyīgèfāngfǎdeshìtàn |
_version_ |
1716827813226479616 |