Funding-Evaluation Model of Road System in Living Perimeters
碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 交通運輸研究所 === 90 === Road system is an important infrastructure in the development of living perimeter. In the past, the government funded road projects based on the financial capability. It didn’t consider the difference among living perimeters so that area developments were unbalan...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2002
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/80313799451034391014 |
id |
ndltd-TW-090NCTU0118008 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-090NCTU01180082016-06-27T16:08:59Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/80313799451034391014 Funding-Evaluation Model of Road System in Living Perimeters 生活圈道路系統建設計畫補助評選模式之研究 Cheng-Cheng Lin 林承政 碩士 國立交通大學 交通運輸研究所 90 Road system is an important infrastructure in the development of living perimeter. In the past, the government funded road projects based on the financial capability. It didn’t consider the difference among living perimeters so that area developments were unbalanced. This study tries to find a new funding procedure and develops a fair funding-evaluation model. The funding-evaluation model includes fund allocation and project selection. For fund allocation, this research applies gray relation analysis to select seven representative indicators from twelve initial indicators and uses Compromise Weighting method which combines AHP with entropy to show their importance. The results of case study indicate that an unfair phenomenon in the past has been improved. For project selection, this research establishes evaluation framework which includes three objectives and nine evaluation criteria to select road projects. Furthermore, we compare SAW method in practice with Fuzzy Integral method which is free of additive and independent assumptions. Theoretically, Fuzzy Integral method will be more appropriate. However, It is found from the case study that the results of two methods is similar. It shows that there exits less interactions among nine evaluation criteria. Cheng-Min Feng 馮正民 2002 學位論文 ; thesis 104 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 交通運輸研究所 === 90 === Road system is an important infrastructure in the development of living perimeter. In the past, the government funded road projects based on the financial capability. It didn’t consider the difference among living perimeters so that area developments were unbalanced. This study tries to find a new funding procedure and develops a fair funding-evaluation model.
The funding-evaluation model includes fund allocation and project selection. For fund allocation, this research applies gray relation analysis to select seven representative indicators from twelve initial indicators and uses Compromise Weighting method which combines AHP with entropy to show their importance. The results of case study indicate that an unfair phenomenon in the past has been improved.
For project selection, this research establishes evaluation framework which includes three objectives and nine evaluation criteria to select road projects. Furthermore, we compare SAW method in practice with Fuzzy Integral method which is free of additive and independent assumptions. Theoretically, Fuzzy Integral method will be more appropriate. However, It is found from the case study that the results of two methods is similar. It shows that there exits less interactions among nine evaluation criteria.
|
author2 |
Cheng-Min Feng |
author_facet |
Cheng-Min Feng Cheng-Cheng Lin 林承政 |
author |
Cheng-Cheng Lin 林承政 |
spellingShingle |
Cheng-Cheng Lin 林承政 Funding-Evaluation Model of Road System in Living Perimeters |
author_sort |
Cheng-Cheng Lin |
title |
Funding-Evaluation Model of Road System in Living Perimeters |
title_short |
Funding-Evaluation Model of Road System in Living Perimeters |
title_full |
Funding-Evaluation Model of Road System in Living Perimeters |
title_fullStr |
Funding-Evaluation Model of Road System in Living Perimeters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Funding-Evaluation Model of Road System in Living Perimeters |
title_sort |
funding-evaluation model of road system in living perimeters |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/80313799451034391014 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chengchenglin fundingevaluationmodelofroadsysteminlivingperimeters AT línchéngzhèng fundingevaluationmodelofroadsysteminlivingperimeters AT chengchenglin shēnghuóquāndàolùxìtǒngjiànshèjìhuàbǔzhùpíngxuǎnmóshìzhīyánjiū AT línchéngzhèng shēnghuóquāndàolùxìtǒngjiànshèjìhuàbǔzhùpíngxuǎnmóshìzhīyánjiū |
_version_ |
1718324329417015296 |