Summary: | 碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 交通運輸研究所 === 90 === Road system is an important infrastructure in the development of living perimeter. In the past, the government funded road projects based on the financial capability. It didn’t consider the difference among living perimeters so that area developments were unbalanced. This study tries to find a new funding procedure and develops a fair funding-evaluation model.
The funding-evaluation model includes fund allocation and project selection. For fund allocation, this research applies gray relation analysis to select seven representative indicators from twelve initial indicators and uses Compromise Weighting method which combines AHP with entropy to show their importance. The results of case study indicate that an unfair phenomenon in the past has been improved.
For project selection, this research establishes evaluation framework which includes three objectives and nine evaluation criteria to select road projects. Furthermore, we compare SAW method in practice with Fuzzy Integral method which is free of additive and independent assumptions. Theoretically, Fuzzy Integral method will be more appropriate. However, It is found from the case study that the results of two methods is similar. It shows that there exits less interactions among nine evaluation criteria.
|