The Analysis of Basketball Shootingon Different Distance and Movement

• Main Authors: Su-Li Chin, 覃素莉
• Other Authors: none
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2002
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/6pjuu3

碩士 === 國立體育學院 === 教練研究所 === 90 === ABSTRACT If you want to win in a basketball game, the most important thing is to get more points(put the ball into basket).This study focus on basketball shooting. In order to do this research, we chosen 16 elite male basketball players as the subjects in this study. There were two equipments used in this research: one was video camera which we used to gather subjects’ shootings kinematics data; the other was EMED Pedar System which was used to collect and analyze plantar pressure data. First, we analyzed that if field goal percentage changes as the distance and motion difference. Second, we discussed if field goal percentage changed as the angle of joint changed while shooting. Finally, we compared the largest force and pressure in first and second peak. The results were as followings: 1. There was no significant difference on same distance and different motion, same motion and different distance. 2. The results from kinematics analyze which was related to field goal percentage include:(1) Field goal was higher in 3 points set shot if the ankle joint was bigger. (2) Field goal was higher in 3 points jump shot and step shot if the knee joint was bigger. But field goal was lower in 2 points standing shot if the knee joint was bigger. (3) Field goal was higher in 3 points step shot if the shoulder joint was bigger. (4) Field goal was lower in 2 points standing shot and 3 point step shot if the elbow joint was bigger. (5) Field goal was higher if the vertical velocity of center of gravity and the velocity of center of gravity were slower what in 2 points standing shot. (6) Field goal was higher if the ball snap form hand was faster in 2 points step shot. 3. In this research we found that the ground reaction force from shooting in preferred foot was bigger but there was not significant.