Social Policy Analysis : Plan and Practice of Special Care Allowance in Taiwan

碩士 === 國立陽明大學 === 衛生福利研究所 === 89 === The ‘special care allowance’ is one of payment for care systems, which were practiced for many years in some countries. The thesis attempts to explore plan and practice of special care allowance in Taiwan, to know contentions and intensions of policy, to understa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sun-I Lo, 羅森益
Other Authors: Yu-Wei Wanne
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2001
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/88101838044753610711
id ndltd-TW-089YM000599011
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-089YM0005990112015-10-13T12:14:42Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/88101838044753610711 Social Policy Analysis : Plan and Practice of Special Care Allowance in Taiwan 特別照顧津貼─政策的規劃與實施 Sun-I Lo 羅森益 碩士 國立陽明大學 衛生福利研究所 89 The ‘special care allowance’ is one of payment for care systems, which were practiced for many years in some countries. The thesis attempts to explore plan and practice of special care allowance in Taiwan, to know contentions and intensions of policy, to understand the living experience of caregivers and policy content, then providing policy suggestions. The methodology, of thesis applies multimethod, including policy content analysis, in-depth interview and papers search, the stage of data analysis by social policy method and context interpretation. The sample includes important people and caregivers. The findings of this study: 1.Understanding the historical context, the ‘special care allowance’is not a major social welfare policy in Taiwan. 2.The special care allowance is still a kind of residual welfare, results in the contradiction of intension. 3.The comparison of caregiver’s experience: a.For caregivers, the allowance is not an inducement of providing care. b.Living in family can’t make sure elder will be cared. c.The faulty measures leads to sexual odds. d.The sum of benefit is too little to break a redeeming goal. e.De-familization, caregivers need individual entitlement rules. f.Policy must concern unbroken human needs. g.Economic benefit directed toward caregivers maybe another negative affection. The policy suggestion as follows: 1.Cancelling means-test, a wrongful rule. 2.The social welfare policy comes from social citizenship of elder and caregiver should be built, and individual become a unit of proof eligibility. 3.Reducing entitlement rules. 4.The human needs can’t be disregarded, providing plural forms of benefits or services delivered, example home care (in-kind) and benefit (cash). 5.Building acceptable quality assurance or cancelling it. 6.To protect the working right of female comes from civil right, example providing perfect home service or building service credit bank etc. 7.Building financing method. Yu-Wei Wanne 萬育維 2001 學位論文 ; thesis 92 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立陽明大學 === 衛生福利研究所 === 89 === The ‘special care allowance’ is one of payment for care systems, which were practiced for many years in some countries. The thesis attempts to explore plan and practice of special care allowance in Taiwan, to know contentions and intensions of policy, to understand the living experience of caregivers and policy content, then providing policy suggestions. The methodology, of thesis applies multimethod, including policy content analysis, in-depth interview and papers search, the stage of data analysis by social policy method and context interpretation. The sample includes important people and caregivers. The findings of this study: 1.Understanding the historical context, the ‘special care allowance’is not a major social welfare policy in Taiwan. 2.The special care allowance is still a kind of residual welfare, results in the contradiction of intension. 3.The comparison of caregiver’s experience: a.For caregivers, the allowance is not an inducement of providing care. b.Living in family can’t make sure elder will be cared. c.The faulty measures leads to sexual odds. d.The sum of benefit is too little to break a redeeming goal. e.De-familization, caregivers need individual entitlement rules. f.Policy must concern unbroken human needs. g.Economic benefit directed toward caregivers maybe another negative affection. The policy suggestion as follows: 1.Cancelling means-test, a wrongful rule. 2.The social welfare policy comes from social citizenship of elder and caregiver should be built, and individual become a unit of proof eligibility. 3.Reducing entitlement rules. 4.The human needs can’t be disregarded, providing plural forms of benefits or services delivered, example home care (in-kind) and benefit (cash). 5.Building acceptable quality assurance or cancelling it. 6.To protect the working right of female comes from civil right, example providing perfect home service or building service credit bank etc. 7.Building financing method.
author2 Yu-Wei Wanne
author_facet Yu-Wei Wanne
Sun-I Lo
羅森益
author Sun-I Lo
羅森益
spellingShingle Sun-I Lo
羅森益
Social Policy Analysis : Plan and Practice of Special Care Allowance in Taiwan
author_sort Sun-I Lo
title Social Policy Analysis : Plan and Practice of Special Care Allowance in Taiwan
title_short Social Policy Analysis : Plan and Practice of Special Care Allowance in Taiwan
title_full Social Policy Analysis : Plan and Practice of Special Care Allowance in Taiwan
title_fullStr Social Policy Analysis : Plan and Practice of Special Care Allowance in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Social Policy Analysis : Plan and Practice of Special Care Allowance in Taiwan
title_sort social policy analysis : plan and practice of special care allowance in taiwan
publishDate 2001
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/88101838044753610711
work_keys_str_mv AT sunilo socialpolicyanalysisplanandpracticeofspecialcareallowanceintaiwan
AT luósēnyì socialpolicyanalysisplanandpracticeofspecialcareallowanceintaiwan
AT sunilo tèbiézhàogùjīntiēzhèngcèdeguīhuàyǔshíshī
AT luósēnyì tèbiézhàogùjīntiēzhèngcèdeguīhuàyǔshíshī
_version_ 1716855439175450624