花蓮縣國小學生自然保育環境素養之研究

碩士 === 國立花蓮師範學院 === 國小科學教育研究所 === 89 === The main purpose of this study was to investigate the elementary school students’ environmental literacy on the conservation of nature in Hualien County. Four domains of environmental literacy were examined respectively. The domains were cognitive, affective,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 游雅如
Other Authors: 石明卿
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2001
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/91226477764192777833
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立花蓮師範學院 === 國小科學教育研究所 === 89 === The main purpose of this study was to investigate the elementary school students’ environmental literacy on the conservation of nature in Hualien County. Four domains of environmental literacy were examined respectively. The domains were cognitive, affective, skill and responsible environmental behavior. Totally, 592 fourth grade and sixth grade students were sampled from urban, rural and aboriginal elementary schools as the research subjects and 582 were valid samples. A questionnaire was developed by the researcher and employed as the research instrument. After analyzing collected data, some results were made as the following : 1.The students’ environmental literacy on the conservation of nature was fairly good. With regards to the average scores rated on the four domain were : Cognitive domain : 68.45﹪; Affective domain : 79.43﹪; Skill domain : 79.59﹪; Responsible environmental behavior domain : 71.65﹪; 2.76.29﹪of the subjects have participated in the activities related to the conservation of nature. There was no significant differences on the test score of the four domains between the students who have and have not participated in the activities related to the conservation of nature. 3.With the students’ scores in the cognitive domain, significant differences were found with respects to gender, grade, ethnicity, social economic status and area of residence respectively. 4.With the students’ scores in the affective domain, significant differences were found with respecst to gender, grade, ethnicity, social economic status and area of residence respectively. 5.With the students’ scores in the skill domain, significant differences were found with respects to gender, grade, ethnicity, social economic status respectively. However, no significant difference were found with respect to area of residence. 6.With the students’ scores in the responsible environmental behavior domain, significant differences were found with respects to gender, grade, ethnicity, social economic status and area of residence respectively. 7.There were positive correlation between any two of the four domains of the environmental literacy on the conservation of nature of the students.