A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms
碩士 === 國立嘉義大學 === 國民教育研究所 === 89 === A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms Abstract This study investigated first graders’ written forms from an emergent literacy perspective. This study was guided by the following research questions: 1.What are the forms a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2001
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24014874364421294860 |
id |
ndltd-TW-089NCYU0576017 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-089NCYU05760172016-01-29T04:28:36Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24014874364421294860 A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms 國小一年級學童寫作形式之個案研究 Hui Shan Tasi 蔡蕙珊 碩士 國立嘉義大學 國民教育研究所 89 A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms Abstract This study investigated first graders’ written forms from an emergent literacy perspective. This study was guided by the following research questions: 1.What are the forms and functions of symbols in first graders’ written texts? And what are the relationships between the symbols? 2.What are the relationships between writing tasks and the discourse forms in first graders’ written texts? 3.What are the differences between the written forms produced by more mature and less mature first-grade writers? This study employed qualitative research methods to collect and analyze data. These included participant observation, interviewing, and document collection. Conclusions from the research were as follows: 1.Children’s use of symbols was meaning centered, and equivalents between symbols and objects were established in the process of exploring these symbols. 2.The Fill-in-the-Blank writing task produced the greatest amount of non-narrative, disconnected discourse forms. 3.Repetition was an important writing strategy in first graders’ writing. 4.The symbols used by more mature first-grade writers were frequently characters and pictures, and they produced more narrative writings. 5.The use of symbols by less mature first-grade writers was characterized by personal style and invention, and they produced more non-narrative writings. Finally, based on the findings, the researcher presents pedagogical implications and topics for further research in the future. Key words: Emergent literacy, Written forms, Symbols, Discourse Tien Chang Shen 沈添鉦 2001 學位論文 ; thesis 151 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立嘉義大學 === 國民教育研究所 === 89 === A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms
Abstract
This study investigated first graders’ written forms from an emergent literacy perspective. This study was guided by the following research questions:
1.What are the forms and functions of symbols in first graders’ written texts? And what are the relationships between the symbols?
2.What are the relationships between writing tasks and the discourse forms in first graders’ written texts?
3.What are the differences between the written forms produced by more mature and less mature first-grade writers?
This study employed qualitative research methods to collect and analyze data. These included participant observation, interviewing, and document collection. Conclusions from the research were as follows:
1.Children’s use of symbols was meaning centered, and equivalents between symbols and objects were established in the process of exploring these symbols.
2.The Fill-in-the-Blank writing task produced the greatest amount of non-narrative, disconnected discourse forms.
3.Repetition was an important writing strategy in first graders’ writing.
4.The symbols used by more mature first-grade writers were frequently characters and pictures, and they produced more narrative writings.
5.The use of symbols by less mature first-grade writers was characterized by personal style and invention, and they produced more non-narrative writings.
Finally, based on the findings, the researcher presents pedagogical implications and topics for further research in the future.
Key words: Emergent literacy, Written forms, Symbols, Discourse
|
author2 |
Tien Chang Shen |
author_facet |
Tien Chang Shen Hui Shan Tasi 蔡蕙珊 |
author |
Hui Shan Tasi 蔡蕙珊 |
spellingShingle |
Hui Shan Tasi 蔡蕙珊 A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms |
author_sort |
Hui Shan Tasi |
title |
A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms |
title_short |
A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms |
title_full |
A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms |
title_fullStr |
A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Case Study of First Graders’ Written Forms |
title_sort |
case study of first graders’ written forms |
publishDate |
2001 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/24014874364421294860 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT huishantasi acasestudyoffirstgraderswrittenforms AT càihuìshān acasestudyoffirstgraderswrittenforms AT huishantasi guóxiǎoyīniánjíxuétóngxiězuòxíngshìzhīgèànyánjiū AT càihuìshān guóxiǎoyīniánjíxuétóngxiězuòxíngshìzhīgèànyánjiū AT huishantasi casestudyoffirstgraderswrittenforms AT càihuìshān casestudyoffirstgraderswrittenforms |
_version_ |
1718171957667561472 |