The Study on the Influence of Teaching Plan

碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 技術及職業教育研究所 === 88 === The objective of this study aims to provide in-depth analysis on how the contents of the instruction plan and variables for automotive division in senior vocational high schools between the existing curricular standards launched in school year 1986 and the n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liou Yaw-Dong, 劉耀東
Other Authors: Lin Hui-Liang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2000
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/94832824957332557233
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 技術及職業教育研究所 === 88 === The objective of this study aims to provide in-depth analysis on how the contents of the instruction plan and variables for automotive division in senior vocational high schools between the existing curricular standards launched in school year 1986 and the newly inaugurated curricular standards introduced in school year 2000, with due examination on the significance of skill tests to the learning curriculum and instruction plan. Some of the crucial findings concluded by the study are listed as follows, 1. Under the current 1986 curricular standards, what instructors look to define the contents of teaching when drafting an instruction plan can be sequentially rated as the teaching methods, teaching resources, learning evaluation and teaching objectives. Whereas in the new 2000 curricular standards, teaching methods ranks first, followed by teaching resources, teaching contents, learning objectives and then learning evaluation. 2. Under the current 1986 curricular standards, what dictates the instructor in drafting the contents of an instruction plan lies most crucially in the instructor''''s teaching orientation, followed by the school''''s administrative measures, timing and process of teaching, parental expectation, students'''' background and industry expectation. Whereas in the new 2000 curricular standards, the instructor''''s teaching orientation remains most crucial, followed by the school''''s administrative measures, parental expectation, timing and progress of teaching, students'''' background, curricular standards and industry expectation. 3. Under both the current 1986 curricular standards and the new 2000 curricular standards, the instructors agree that skill tests would alter the teaching objectives in shop learning, while they also support the view that skill tests would somewhat influence the teaching contents, teaching methods and teaching resources in shop learning. 4. Under the current 1986 curricular standards, the instructors who possess a professional automotive repair licensing are found to emphasize more on clearly defined contents for the instruction plan than those that doe not. Whereas under the new 2000 curricular standards, the instructors at public schools are more keen on drafting the contents of an instruction plan than their peers in private schools. 5. Under both the current 1986 curricular standards and the new 2000 curricular standards, the decision on the teaching contents, teaching methods and teaching resources in shop teaching among private school instructors are found more tied to the skill tests than their peers in public schools. Whereas under the new 2000 curricular standards alone, the decision on the learning objectives in shop teaching among instructors who also double certain administrative responsibilities are more prone to be influenced by skill tests than full-time instructors. 6. Most instructors agree that the inauguration of the 2000 curricular standards can more adequately address all variables behind an instruction plan, compared to the 1986 curricular standards, of which school''''s administrative measures, parental expectation, students'''' background are regarded as more significant variables. 7. Most instructors reckon that the inauguration of the 2000 curricular standards will see a more profound significant of skills tests in determining the teaching contents and teaching methods of shop teaching, compared to the 1986 curricular standards.