Performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting

碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 資訊管理系 === 88 === An important part of a distribution/parallel system design is the workload sharing among the processors. This includes partitioning the arriving jobs into tasks that can be executed in parallel, assigning the tasks to processors and scheduling the task execution...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 林育梨
Other Authors: 楊維寧
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2000
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/31368840306641028019
id ndltd-TW-088NTUST396007
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-088NTUST3960072016-01-29T04:18:54Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/31368840306641028019 Performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting 工作分割與不分割之效能比較 林育梨 碩士 國立臺灣科技大學 資訊管理系 88 An important part of a distribution/parallel system design is the workload sharing among the processors. This includes partitioning the arriving jobs into tasks that can be executed in parallel, assigning the tasks to processors and scheduling the task execution on each processor. In Anthony karageorgos and Helen karatza’s (1997) paper they examine the efficiency of two task routing strategies and three nonpreemptive task scheduling policies in conjunction with job resequencing before departure. The job must depature in the order of their arrival. We analyze by simulation the difference between Fork-Join System and single processor model. Single processor model examines the efficiency in the mean response time and system throughput of one task routing and three task scheduling strategies. For the performance measures of mean response time and throughput, empirical results show that single processor model outperforms the Fork-Join System. 楊維寧 2000 學位論文 ; thesis 30 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 資訊管理系 === 88 === An important part of a distribution/parallel system design is the workload sharing among the processors. This includes partitioning the arriving jobs into tasks that can be executed in parallel, assigning the tasks to processors and scheduling the task execution on each processor. In Anthony karageorgos and Helen karatza’s (1997) paper they examine the efficiency of two task routing strategies and three nonpreemptive task scheduling policies in conjunction with job resequencing before departure. The job must depature in the order of their arrival. We analyze by simulation the difference between Fork-Join System and single processor model. Single processor model examines the efficiency in the mean response time and system throughput of one task routing and three task scheduling strategies. For the performance measures of mean response time and throughput, empirical results show that single processor model outperforms the Fork-Join System.
author2 楊維寧
author_facet 楊維寧
林育梨
author 林育梨
spellingShingle 林育梨
Performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting
author_sort 林育梨
title Performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting
title_short Performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting
title_full Performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting
title_fullStr Performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting
title_sort performance comparison of jobs with and without task splitting
publishDate 2000
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/31368840306641028019
work_keys_str_mv AT línyùlí performancecomparisonofjobswithandwithouttasksplitting
AT línyùlí gōngzuòfēngēyǔbùfēngēzhīxiàonéngbǐjiào
_version_ 1718168051726155776