A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy on Global IC Industry

碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 科技管理所 === 88 === The purpose of this research is to analyze impacts of innovation policy on global IC (Integrated circuit) industry. Countries analyzed are United States, Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and People''s Republic of China. Based on Rothwell and Zegveld''...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chao-Cheng Yu, 游朝成
Other Authors: Joseph Z. Shyu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2000
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/15119632684975581840
id ndltd-TW-088NCTU0230014
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-088NCTU02300142015-10-13T10:59:52Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/15119632684975581840 A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy on Global IC Industry 全球IC產業創新政策比較分析之研究 Chao-Cheng Yu 游朝成 碩士 國立交通大學 科技管理所 88 The purpose of this research is to analyze impacts of innovation policy on global IC (Integrated circuit) industry. Countries analyzed are United States, Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and People''s Republic of China. Based on Rothwell and Zegveld''s model of "Industrial Innovation Policy", this research develops a cross-national comparative analysis of innovation policy, and focuses on three topics: the preference of innovation policy, the extent of influence of innovation policy on industrial innovation requirements (IIRs), and the competitive advantages (CAs) derived from IIRs in these four countries. The results show that all these countries prefer to use the two types of innovation policy tools, namely, "Scientific & Technical" and "Legal & Regulatory". Whereas United States prefers to use "Procurement", Republic of Korea prefers to "Financial" and "Taxation", and Taiwan prefers to "Political" policy. In terms of effectiveness of industrial innovation policies on IIRs, "R&D", "R&D Environment", "Technical Knowledge", and "Human Resource" exert the strongest impacts on their respective IIRs. For the IC industry of all countries, United States has all CAs in terms of IIRs, but none was evidenced for P.R.C. except for "Domestic Market Demand". Republic of Korea has only few CAs compared to People''s Republic of China, while Taiwan not only has many CAs relative to People''s Republic of China, but also relative to Republic of Korea in "Management Skill", "Human Resource", and "Financial Resource". Compared to the United States, Taiwan has competitive disadvantages in "R&D", "R&D Environment", "Market Information" and "Domestic Market Demand". This work generates several suggestions for Taiwan''s IC industry: the government should emphasize the policies in "Scientific & Technical" and "Taxation" to provide better R&D environment, build a complete information system to encourage knowledge diffusion and accumulation, and adopt "Procurement" policy to extend domestic market demand. Joseph Z. Shyu 徐作聖 2000 學位論文 ; thesis 114 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 科技管理所 === 88 === The purpose of this research is to analyze impacts of innovation policy on global IC (Integrated circuit) industry. Countries analyzed are United States, Republic of Korea, Taiwan, and People''s Republic of China. Based on Rothwell and Zegveld''s model of "Industrial Innovation Policy", this research develops a cross-national comparative analysis of innovation policy, and focuses on three topics: the preference of innovation policy, the extent of influence of innovation policy on industrial innovation requirements (IIRs), and the competitive advantages (CAs) derived from IIRs in these four countries. The results show that all these countries prefer to use the two types of innovation policy tools, namely, "Scientific & Technical" and "Legal & Regulatory". Whereas United States prefers to use "Procurement", Republic of Korea prefers to "Financial" and "Taxation", and Taiwan prefers to "Political" policy. In terms of effectiveness of industrial innovation policies on IIRs, "R&D", "R&D Environment", "Technical Knowledge", and "Human Resource" exert the strongest impacts on their respective IIRs. For the IC industry of all countries, United States has all CAs in terms of IIRs, but none was evidenced for P.R.C. except for "Domestic Market Demand". Republic of Korea has only few CAs compared to People''s Republic of China, while Taiwan not only has many CAs relative to People''s Republic of China, but also relative to Republic of Korea in "Management Skill", "Human Resource", and "Financial Resource". Compared to the United States, Taiwan has competitive disadvantages in "R&D", "R&D Environment", "Market Information" and "Domestic Market Demand". This work generates several suggestions for Taiwan''s IC industry: the government should emphasize the policies in "Scientific & Technical" and "Taxation" to provide better R&D environment, build a complete information system to encourage knowledge diffusion and accumulation, and adopt "Procurement" policy to extend domestic market demand.
author2 Joseph Z. Shyu
author_facet Joseph Z. Shyu
Chao-Cheng Yu
游朝成
author Chao-Cheng Yu
游朝成
spellingShingle Chao-Cheng Yu
游朝成
A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy on Global IC Industry
author_sort Chao-Cheng Yu
title A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy on Global IC Industry
title_short A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy on Global IC Industry
title_full A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy on Global IC Industry
title_fullStr A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy on Global IC Industry
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Innovation Policy on Global IC Industry
title_sort cross-national comparative analysis of innovation policy on global ic industry
publishDate 2000
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/15119632684975581840
work_keys_str_mv AT chaochengyu acrossnationalcomparativeanalysisofinnovationpolicyonglobalicindustry
AT yóucháochéng acrossnationalcomparativeanalysisofinnovationpolicyonglobalicindustry
AT chaochengyu quánqiúicchǎnyèchuàngxīnzhèngcèbǐjiàofēnxīzhīyánjiū
AT yóucháochéng quánqiúicchǎnyèchuàngxīnzhèngcèbǐjiàofēnxīzhīyánjiū
AT chaochengyu crossnationalcomparativeanalysisofinnovationpolicyonglobalicindustry
AT yóucháochéng crossnationalcomparativeanalysisofinnovationpolicyonglobalicindustry
_version_ 1716835332250402816