The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 會計學系 === 88 === Abstract Over the past fifty years, January Effect has always been an interest topic. However, no conclusive explanations have ever been offered. January is the time for management of corporations and investors to confirm the performance of last year and...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2000
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04753580250103842565 |
id |
ndltd-TW-088NCCU0385039 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-088NCCU03850392015-10-13T10:56:28Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04753580250103842565 The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings 一月效應與盈餘成長力之關聯性研究 Lin, Po-yen 林伯諺 碩士 國立政治大學 會計學系 88 Abstract Over the past fifty years, January Effect has always been an interest topic. However, no conclusive explanations have ever been offered. January is the time for management of corporations and investors to confirm the performance of last year and to form expectations of the coming year. Therefore, it may be reasonable to hypothesize the January Effect is related to the actual profitability of last year and the expected earnings of current year. This study first examine whether Taiwan’s stock market has January Effect. Monthly returns of the sample companies for the period 1994 to 1999 are tested. The result indicated that there is a negative January Effect, which runs contrary to most of the previous research findings. However, recent studies on Taiwan’s stock market have drown more conclusions refuting the hypothesis that Taiwan’s stock market has positive January Effect. This study further examines the relationship between the January cumulative abnormal returns of sample companies and the unexpected earnings of the previous year and the first quarter of the current year. Regression model is employed. The result indicates that there is negative, though not significant, relationship. The earnings are then further partitioned into permanent and transitory. A new regression analysis using the permanent unexpected earnings is performed. The result is the same but more significant. When company size using the market value as a proxy is added to the regression model, it shows that small companies tend to have higher cumulative abnormal returns. In summary, this study finds no significant relationship between the stock returns in January and the unexpected earnings of the previous year and/or the first quarter of the current year. Cheng, Ding Wang 鄭丁旺 2000 學位論文 ; thesis 96 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 會計學系 === 88 === Abstract
Over the past fifty years, January Effect has always been an interest topic. However, no conclusive explanations have ever been offered. January is the time for management of corporations and investors to confirm the performance of last year and to form expectations of the coming year. Therefore, it may be reasonable to hypothesize the January Effect is related to the actual profitability of last year and the expected earnings of current year.
This study first examine whether Taiwan’s stock market has January Effect. Monthly returns of the sample companies for the period 1994 to 1999 are tested. The result indicated that there is a negative January Effect, which runs contrary to most of the previous research findings. However, recent studies on Taiwan’s stock market have drown more conclusions refuting the hypothesis that Taiwan’s stock market has positive January Effect.
This study further examines the relationship between the January cumulative abnormal returns of sample companies and the unexpected earnings of the previous year and the first quarter of the current year. Regression model is employed. The result indicates that there is negative, though not significant, relationship. The earnings are then further partitioned into permanent and transitory.
A new regression analysis using the permanent unexpected earnings is performed. The result is the same but more significant. When company size using the market value as a proxy is added to the regression model, it shows that small companies tend to have higher cumulative abnormal returns.
In summary, this study finds no significant relationship between the stock returns in January and the unexpected earnings of the previous year and/or the first quarter of the current year.
|
author2 |
Cheng, Ding Wang |
author_facet |
Cheng, Ding Wang Lin, Po-yen 林伯諺 |
author |
Lin, Po-yen 林伯諺 |
spellingShingle |
Lin, Po-yen 林伯諺 The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings |
author_sort |
Lin, Po-yen |
title |
The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings |
title_short |
The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings |
title_full |
The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings |
title_fullStr |
The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings |
title_full_unstemmed |
The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings |
title_sort |
relationship between january effect and growth of earnings |
publishDate |
2000 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04753580250103842565 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT linpoyen therelationshipbetweenjanuaryeffectandgrowthofearnings AT línbóyàn therelationshipbetweenjanuaryeffectandgrowthofearnings AT linpoyen yīyuèxiàoyīngyǔyíngyúchéngzhǎnglìzhīguānliánxìngyánjiū AT línbóyàn yīyuèxiàoyīngyǔyíngyúchéngzhǎnglìzhīguānliánxìngyánjiū AT linpoyen relationshipbetweenjanuaryeffectandgrowthofearnings AT línbóyàn relationshipbetweenjanuaryeffectandgrowthofearnings |
_version_ |
1716833763815587840 |