The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings

碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 會計學系 === 88 === Abstract Over the past fifty years, January Effect has always been an interest topic. However, no conclusive explanations have ever been offered. January is the time for management of corporations and investors to confirm the performance of last year and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lin, Po-yen, 林伯諺
Other Authors: Cheng, Ding Wang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2000
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04753580250103842565
id ndltd-TW-088NCCU0385039
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-088NCCU03850392015-10-13T10:56:28Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04753580250103842565 The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings 一月效應與盈餘成長力之關聯性研究 Lin, Po-yen 林伯諺 碩士 國立政治大學 會計學系 88 Abstract Over the past fifty years, January Effect has always been an interest topic. However, no conclusive explanations have ever been offered. January is the time for management of corporations and investors to confirm the performance of last year and to form expectations of the coming year. Therefore, it may be reasonable to hypothesize the January Effect is related to the actual profitability of last year and the expected earnings of current year. This study first examine whether Taiwan’s stock market has January Effect. Monthly returns of the sample companies for the period 1994 to 1999 are tested. The result indicated that there is a negative January Effect, which runs contrary to most of the previous research findings. However, recent studies on Taiwan’s stock market have drown more conclusions refuting the hypothesis that Taiwan’s stock market has positive January Effect. This study further examines the relationship between the January cumulative abnormal returns of sample companies and the unexpected earnings of the previous year and the first quarter of the current year. Regression model is employed. The result indicates that there is negative, though not significant, relationship. The earnings are then further partitioned into permanent and transitory. A new regression analysis using the permanent unexpected earnings is performed. The result is the same but more significant. When company size using the market value as a proxy is added to the regression model, it shows that small companies tend to have higher cumulative abnormal returns. In summary, this study finds no significant relationship between the stock returns in January and the unexpected earnings of the previous year and/or the first quarter of the current year. Cheng, Ding Wang 鄭丁旺 2000 學位論文 ; thesis 96 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 會計學系 === 88 === Abstract Over the past fifty years, January Effect has always been an interest topic. However, no conclusive explanations have ever been offered. January is the time for management of corporations and investors to confirm the performance of last year and to form expectations of the coming year. Therefore, it may be reasonable to hypothesize the January Effect is related to the actual profitability of last year and the expected earnings of current year. This study first examine whether Taiwan’s stock market has January Effect. Monthly returns of the sample companies for the period 1994 to 1999 are tested. The result indicated that there is a negative January Effect, which runs contrary to most of the previous research findings. However, recent studies on Taiwan’s stock market have drown more conclusions refuting the hypothesis that Taiwan’s stock market has positive January Effect. This study further examines the relationship between the January cumulative abnormal returns of sample companies and the unexpected earnings of the previous year and the first quarter of the current year. Regression model is employed. The result indicates that there is negative, though not significant, relationship. The earnings are then further partitioned into permanent and transitory. A new regression analysis using the permanent unexpected earnings is performed. The result is the same but more significant. When company size using the market value as a proxy is added to the regression model, it shows that small companies tend to have higher cumulative abnormal returns. In summary, this study finds no significant relationship between the stock returns in January and the unexpected earnings of the previous year and/or the first quarter of the current year.
author2 Cheng, Ding Wang
author_facet Cheng, Ding Wang
Lin, Po-yen
林伯諺
author Lin, Po-yen
林伯諺
spellingShingle Lin, Po-yen
林伯諺
The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings
author_sort Lin, Po-yen
title The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings
title_short The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings
title_full The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings
title_fullStr The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between January Effect and growth of earnings
title_sort relationship between january effect and growth of earnings
publishDate 2000
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/04753580250103842565
work_keys_str_mv AT linpoyen therelationshipbetweenjanuaryeffectandgrowthofearnings
AT línbóyàn therelationshipbetweenjanuaryeffectandgrowthofearnings
AT linpoyen yīyuèxiàoyīngyǔyíngyúchéngzhǎnglìzhīguānliánxìngyánjiū
AT línbóyàn yīyuèxiàoyīngyǔyíngyúchéngzhǎnglìzhīguānliánxìngyánjiū
AT linpoyen relationshipbetweenjanuaryeffectandgrowthofearnings
AT línbóyàn relationshipbetweenjanuaryeffectandgrowthofearnings
_version_ 1716833763815587840