| Summary: | 碩士 === 中原大學 === 室內設計學系 === 88 === Abstract
The study is made specially for professional indoor design technicians in Taiwan (hereinafter referred to as “indoor design technicians”) on the issues of indoor fire-proof safety design in a structure that they may encounter. Descriptive experience survey method is applied in this study where the structure is established by ways of document review. The working stage problems in indoor fire-proof safety and the actual cause of the problems can then be analyzed and inducted after having an overall understanding of the existing issues through meetings with professionals and combining the contents of the thorough discussions with indoor design technicians.
There are two major types of working stage problems: 1. Dubious interpretation on the related regulations for indoor construction: “Management Methods for Indoor Design in a Structure” has excluded wallpapers, carpets, furniture and decorations from the scope of indoor design. The regulations for application of indoor design materials are unclear and the rules on net width and walking distance for fire-fighting escaping facilities are incomplete in “Building Technique Regulations”. No grading has been made in “Fire-Fighting Laws” on the application of flameproof materials. Also, it is inappropriate to include application of flameproof materials in “Fire-Fight Laws”. 2. Insufficient cognition on knowledge of related indoor design regulations and fire-proof materials: Insufficient cognition has been found in “Building Technique Regulations” on regulations for definition of isolation wall, differentiation of fire-fighting area, fire-fighting escaping facilities, fire-fighting equipment, main structure and inflammable materials. Insufficient cognition has been found in Item 2, fire-proof material application regulation, of “Flameproof Performance Approval Standard”. Unclear cognition has been found on fire-proof material inspection, management authority and approval documents for indoor design. Confusion has been caused when excessive fire-proof materials are available in the market. The actual cause of the problems lies on the deviation in thinking pattern: Let the thinking pattern be that indoor design is the outward simple “internal decoration” for a vacant type building construction before its indoor space is “used”. Then, revision on related regulations will cause related regulations for indoor design to be insufficient and, consequently, dubious interpretation on the related regulations for indoor construction. Also, the practice of indoor design training education will cause the actual effect of training education to be insufficient and, consequently, insufficient cognition on knowledge of related indoor design regulations and fire-proof materials.
The countermeasure for solving the actual cause of the problems is to examine the deviation in thinking pattern: Let the thinking pattern be that indoor design is the “internal decoration” for a building construction when its indoor space is “being used”. Then, the countermeasure for solving the problem of dubious interpretation on the related regulations for indoor construction will be to eliminate dubious interpretation on the related regulations for indoor construction and set up “Rules for Indoor Design Techniques in a Structure”. And the countermeasure for solving the problem of insufficient cognition on knowledge of related indoor design regulations and fire-proof materials will be to promote the effect of indoor design training education.
It is hoped that the result of the study can be used as a reference for indoor design technicians in their future fire-proof designs and the competent authority in their future handling of related indoor construction matters.
Key words: Indoor construction, fire-proof safety design, professional design technicians for indoor construction in a structure
|
|---|
