A Comparison of the Forecasting Performance between GARCH and Implied Volatility Models

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 財務金融學系 === 87 === Volatility forecasting is very important to derivative pricing, hedging, and risk management. The introduction of option market might provide new information regarding the market''s consensus of future volatility. Previous empirical results on the forecast...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei-Peng Chen, 陳煒朋
Other Authors: Huimin Chung
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1999
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67696532063274292945
id ndltd-TW-087TKU00304023
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-087TKU003040232016-02-01T04:13:05Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67696532063274292945 A Comparison of the Forecasting Performance between GARCH and Implied Volatility Models GARCH模型與隱含波動性模型預測能力之比較 Wei-Peng Chen 陳煒朋 碩士 淡江大學 財務金融學系 87 Volatility forecasting is very important to derivative pricing, hedging, and risk management. The introduction of option market might provide new information regarding the market''s consensus of future volatility. Previous empirical results on the forecasting performance of implied volatility model find mixed result for the U.S. market. This thesis compare the forecasting performance of a variety of volatility modes for Taiwan and Hongkong covered warrant markets. Using daily data of both Hongkong and Taiwan markets, the empirical results demonstrate that the historical volatility and GARCH-type models outperform implied volatility model. The implied volatility (IV) model has little information content in providing forecast for future volatility. Similar result are found when the intraday data is used to construct daily observation of volatility. The information content of trading volume in term of daily turnover is also examined. When trading volume is added in the IV model the forecasting performance of IV model increases. Huimin Chung Wen-Liang Shieh 鍾惠民 謝文良 1999 學位論文 ; thesis 181 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 財務金融學系 === 87 === Volatility forecasting is very important to derivative pricing, hedging, and risk management. The introduction of option market might provide new information regarding the market''s consensus of future volatility. Previous empirical results on the forecasting performance of implied volatility model find mixed result for the U.S. market. This thesis compare the forecasting performance of a variety of volatility modes for Taiwan and Hongkong covered warrant markets. Using daily data of both Hongkong and Taiwan markets, the empirical results demonstrate that the historical volatility and GARCH-type models outperform implied volatility model. The implied volatility (IV) model has little information content in providing forecast for future volatility. Similar result are found when the intraday data is used to construct daily observation of volatility. The information content of trading volume in term of daily turnover is also examined. When trading volume is added in the IV model the forecasting performance of IV model increases.
author2 Huimin Chung
author_facet Huimin Chung
Wei-Peng Chen
陳煒朋
author Wei-Peng Chen
陳煒朋
spellingShingle Wei-Peng Chen
陳煒朋
A Comparison of the Forecasting Performance between GARCH and Implied Volatility Models
author_sort Wei-Peng Chen
title A Comparison of the Forecasting Performance between GARCH and Implied Volatility Models
title_short A Comparison of the Forecasting Performance between GARCH and Implied Volatility Models
title_full A Comparison of the Forecasting Performance between GARCH and Implied Volatility Models
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Forecasting Performance between GARCH and Implied Volatility Models
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Forecasting Performance between GARCH and Implied Volatility Models
title_sort comparison of the forecasting performance between garch and implied volatility models
publishDate 1999
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67696532063274292945
work_keys_str_mv AT weipengchen acomparisonoftheforecastingperformancebetweengarchandimpliedvolatilitymodels
AT chénwěipéng acomparisonoftheforecastingperformancebetweengarchandimpliedvolatilitymodels
AT weipengchen garchmóxíngyǔyǐnhánbōdòngxìngmóxíngyùcènénglìzhībǐjiào
AT chénwěipéng garchmóxíngyǔyǐnhánbōdòngxìngmóxíngyùcènénglìzhībǐjiào
AT weipengchen comparisonoftheforecastingperformancebetweengarchandimpliedvolatilitymodels
AT chénwěipéng comparisonoftheforecastingperformancebetweengarchandimpliedvolatilitymodels
_version_ 1718175783037435904