Detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 獸醫學研究所 === 87 === For monitoring four frequently used sulfonamides, sulfadimethoxine (SDM), sulfamonomethoxine (SMM), sulfamethazine (SMT), and sulfaquinoxaline (SQ) in the chicken farm, chicken meat samples were collected from seventeen counties in Taiwan during the per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Re-Shang Chen, 陳瑞祥
Other Authors: Chaw King Liu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1999
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20220826053280187550
id ndltd-TW-087NTU00541029
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-087NTU005410292016-02-01T04:12:42Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20220826053280187550 Detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm 肉雞場常用磺胺劑在雞肉中之檢測 Re-Shang Chen 陳瑞祥 碩士 國立臺灣大學 獸醫學研究所 87 For monitoring four frequently used sulfonamides, sulfadimethoxine (SDM), sulfamonomethoxine (SMM), sulfamethazine (SMT), and sulfaquinoxaline (SQ) in the chicken farm, chicken meat samples were collected from seventeen counties in Taiwan during the period of November, 1997 to March, 1999. After weighted and crushed, the chicken chest meat was extracted and detected for the sulfonamides by using the thin layer chromatography (TLC). Among 347 chicken samples, 5.19﹪(18/347) of them were positive. Moreover, two samples contained both SMM and SMT using TLC method. The TLC-positive samples were further determined their residue quantities by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The percentage of positive samples which contained over the tolerance level 0.1 ppm was 4.03﹪(14/347). HPLC results also showed three samples contained both SMM and SMT while TLC only detected two such samples. The third sample contained 0.006 ppm of SMT, which was lower than TLC detection limit. The detection limits were 0.01 ppm and 0.006 ppm for TLC and HPLC, respectively. The statistical method was employed to analyze the significant difference positive samples with respective to different locations and to different seasons of the year in Taiwan. It was shown that no significant difference was observed between seasons while the expected positive samples from the different locations of Taiwan were significantly different (p<0.01). Furthermore, the difference between the amounts of any two sulfonamides in positive samples was compared with each other. Both SMM vs. SDM and SQ vs. SDM were of significant difference (p<0.05). However, there is no significant difference for either SMM vs. SMT or SQ vs. SMT. In conclusion, the TLC and HPLC methods can be employed in detecting the residue of chicken meat in farm. Results showed that the SMM and SQ are commonly used in chicken farms in Taiwan. Chaw King Liu 劉 朝 鑫 1999 學位論文 ; thesis 100 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 獸醫學研究所 === 87 === For monitoring four frequently used sulfonamides, sulfadimethoxine (SDM), sulfamonomethoxine (SMM), sulfamethazine (SMT), and sulfaquinoxaline (SQ) in the chicken farm, chicken meat samples were collected from seventeen counties in Taiwan during the period of November, 1997 to March, 1999. After weighted and crushed, the chicken chest meat was extracted and detected for the sulfonamides by using the thin layer chromatography (TLC). Among 347 chicken samples, 5.19﹪(18/347) of them were positive. Moreover, two samples contained both SMM and SMT using TLC method. The TLC-positive samples were further determined their residue quantities by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The percentage of positive samples which contained over the tolerance level 0.1 ppm was 4.03﹪(14/347). HPLC results also showed three samples contained both SMM and SMT while TLC only detected two such samples. The third sample contained 0.006 ppm of SMT, which was lower than TLC detection limit. The detection limits were 0.01 ppm and 0.006 ppm for TLC and HPLC, respectively. The statistical method was employed to analyze the significant difference positive samples with respective to different locations and to different seasons of the year in Taiwan. It was shown that no significant difference was observed between seasons while the expected positive samples from the different locations of Taiwan were significantly different (p<0.01). Furthermore, the difference between the amounts of any two sulfonamides in positive samples was compared with each other. Both SMM vs. SDM and SQ vs. SDM were of significant difference (p<0.05). However, there is no significant difference for either SMM vs. SMT or SQ vs. SMT. In conclusion, the TLC and HPLC methods can be employed in detecting the residue of chicken meat in farm. Results showed that the SMM and SQ are commonly used in chicken farms in Taiwan.
author2 Chaw King Liu
author_facet Chaw King Liu
Re-Shang Chen
陳瑞祥
author Re-Shang Chen
陳瑞祥
spellingShingle Re-Shang Chen
陳瑞祥
Detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm
author_sort Re-Shang Chen
title Detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm
title_short Detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm
title_full Detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm
title_fullStr Detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm
title_full_unstemmed Detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm
title_sort detection of commonly used sulfonamides in chicken meat from broiler farm
publishDate 1999
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20220826053280187550
work_keys_str_mv AT reshangchen detectionofcommonlyusedsulfonamidesinchickenmeatfrombroilerfarm
AT chénruìxiáng detectionofcommonlyusedsulfonamidesinchickenmeatfrombroilerfarm
AT reshangchen ròujīchǎngchángyònghuángànjìzàijīròuzhōngzhījiǎncè
AT chénruìxiáng ròujīchǎngchángyònghuángànjìzàijīròuzhōngzhījiǎncè
_version_ 1718174702767177728