Robert Maynard Hutchins' Educational philosophy: education for free man

碩士 === 台北市立師範學院 === 國民教育研究所 === 86 === The focus of the study are to understand the origin, the general discussion, and the evaluation of Robert M. Hutchins' philosophy of education for free man. The sources of study come from publishe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang, Chen Li, 黃振豐
Other Authors: Yung Hsi Lin
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/45296385972220201917
Description
Summary:碩士 === 台北市立師範學院 === 國民教育研究所 === 86 === The focus of the study are to understand the origin, the general discussion, and the evaluation of Robert M. Hutchins' philosophy of education for free man. The sources of study come from published literature, Hutchins' works, dissertations, papers, internet databases, and homepages. Three main parts of this thesis are: thought of education for free man, contributions and criticisms, and reflections. The thought is divided into four points: origins of thoughts, explanation of free man, relationship between education and free man, and free man education. Hutchins' origin of thoughts come from his lives experiences, western traditional thought, and his self-beliefs. The explanation of free man is a man who knows the goods, goods' order, and practices goods according to goods' order. The relationship between education and free man is that education and free man are interrelated. The curriculum is liberal arts and the Great Books. Two examples of free man education are St. John's College and the Chicago Plan. The contribution of Hutchins' education for free man are as follows: criticizing education, emphasizing free man education, creating a situation for free man education, and building the ideal of democratic community. The criticisms of Hutchins' free man education are polar. The pro criticisms describe Hutchins as a model of free man, a knowing and doing person, and a man who never gave up struggling for his ideal. But the con criticisms are that Hutchins' ideas are anti-currents and emphasize intellect too much. The reflection is that the similar situations exist between Taiwan's present educational problems and Hutchins' criticisms of American educational probelems earlier in this century. Three revelations come form these reflections: the progress is not equal to the happiness, education becomes the tool for external goods, and these problems become the latent worries.