An empirical study of the impacts of contest for director of board position on stock price and trading volume

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 會計學系 === 86 === The main purpose of this research is to investigate economic consequences of contest for board director seats of publicly listed companies on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. By examining the changes of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Yu-Mei, 陳玉媚
Other Authors: Taychang Wang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/87512061981109983258
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 會計學系 === 86 === The main purpose of this research is to investigate economic consequences of contest for board director seats of publicly listed companies on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. By examining the changes of share price and trading volume for the sample companies selected from the period of 1991 to 1996 (Group A), this research empirically tests and clarifies the informational effect of such contest from different dimensions, such as contest intensity, contest results, and types of shareholders'' meetings. Given that ROC Securities and Futures Commision amended the regulations of circulation of proxy letters in 1996, this study also applies the test procedure to the sample companies selected starting from 1997 (Group B) to study the impact of the amendment. The findings from the empirical study can be summarized as follows: 1. Regarding the annual regular shareholders'' meetings (ARM), the incidence of the contest for board directors'' position is negatively related to shareholders'' wealth for both Groups A and B, and the negative return on share prices for both groups are positively related to contest intensity and number of director seats seized by the dissident. 2. For temporary shareholders'' meetings (TSM), occurrence of the contest imposes a positive but not significant effect on shareholders'' wealth for Group A, which results mainly from intensive contest and the dissident''s participation in the company''s board of directors. 3. The trends of trading volume for Groups A and B around ARM are consistent, to some extent, with the hypotheses this research proposes. That is, their trading volumes were higher than normal before the record date but the trend reversed thereafter. However, the trend of trading volume is not statistically related to contest intensity and number of director seats seized by the dissident. Thus a further investigation is needed. Moreover, the trends for the samples around TSM, except the mild contest subsample, are not consistent with the hypotheses.