Study on the Application of Teaching Manpower in Conducting Oral Health Education Program

碩士 === 國防醫學院 === 牙醫學系 === 86 ===   Taiwan still has a high prevalence rate for caries. Although the school education system has included an oral headlth and prevention course, improvement through education is limited. The purpose of this study was to find out an easy way to promote oral health thro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 白青穗
Other Authors: 姚振華
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1998
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/07662051676917436314
id ndltd-TW-086NDMC3089001
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-086NDMC30890012015-10-13T11:06:20Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/07662051676917436314 Study on the Application of Teaching Manpower in Conducting Oral Health Education Program 口腔衛生教育推廣師資運用的研究 白青穗 碩士 國防醫學院 牙醫學系 86   Taiwan still has a high prevalence rate for caries. Although the school education system has included an oral headlth and prevention course, improvement through education is limited. The purpose of this study was to find out an easy way to promote oral health through health teachers in elementary school.   As indicated by parents, 257 students in nine classes of the fifth grade in an elementary school were included in this study. The students were divided clustering randomly into three groups. Initially, the students were (1) clinically examined with DMFS index and modified patient hygiene performance (PHP-M) index; (2) their oral hygiene knowledge, attitude, practice and family socioeconomic status evaluated by questionnaires A. Test groups I and II were placed in an oral health promotion program, which was conducted by the school health teacher for group I and a dentist for group II.   The mean DMFT/DMFS index results were 3.47/4.82. The mean PHP-M index initially was 34.52□6.31, and then developed an average of 30.08□7.04 after the oral health promotion program intervention. There was a statistically significant difference in oral hygiene knowledge, attitude, practice and PHP-M index incremental increase between pretest and posttest groups I and II. There was no significant difference for the control group.   No significant difference in the teaching results between the health teacher and dentist except the degree of knowledge. Although the health teacher was limited in dental knowledge as compared to the dentist, the teacher was very effective in improving students' dental hygiene knowledge. It is suggested that a school-based oral health promotion program is helpful for students' proper oral hygiene. Furthermore, the program was well accepted by students and teachers according to their answers on the questionnaires B & C. 姚振華 1998 學位論文 ; thesis 71 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國防醫學院 === 牙醫學系 === 86 ===   Taiwan still has a high prevalence rate for caries. Although the school education system has included an oral headlth and prevention course, improvement through education is limited. The purpose of this study was to find out an easy way to promote oral health through health teachers in elementary school.   As indicated by parents, 257 students in nine classes of the fifth grade in an elementary school were included in this study. The students were divided clustering randomly into three groups. Initially, the students were (1) clinically examined with DMFS index and modified patient hygiene performance (PHP-M) index; (2) their oral hygiene knowledge, attitude, practice and family socioeconomic status evaluated by questionnaires A. Test groups I and II were placed in an oral health promotion program, which was conducted by the school health teacher for group I and a dentist for group II.   The mean DMFT/DMFS index results were 3.47/4.82. The mean PHP-M index initially was 34.52□6.31, and then developed an average of 30.08□7.04 after the oral health promotion program intervention. There was a statistically significant difference in oral hygiene knowledge, attitude, practice and PHP-M index incremental increase between pretest and posttest groups I and II. There was no significant difference for the control group.   No significant difference in the teaching results between the health teacher and dentist except the degree of knowledge. Although the health teacher was limited in dental knowledge as compared to the dentist, the teacher was very effective in improving students' dental hygiene knowledge. It is suggested that a school-based oral health promotion program is helpful for students' proper oral hygiene. Furthermore, the program was well accepted by students and teachers according to their answers on the questionnaires B & C.
author2 姚振華
author_facet 姚振華
白青穗
author 白青穗
spellingShingle 白青穗
Study on the Application of Teaching Manpower in Conducting Oral Health Education Program
author_sort 白青穗
title Study on the Application of Teaching Manpower in Conducting Oral Health Education Program
title_short Study on the Application of Teaching Manpower in Conducting Oral Health Education Program
title_full Study on the Application of Teaching Manpower in Conducting Oral Health Education Program
title_fullStr Study on the Application of Teaching Manpower in Conducting Oral Health Education Program
title_full_unstemmed Study on the Application of Teaching Manpower in Conducting Oral Health Education Program
title_sort study on the application of teaching manpower in conducting oral health education program
publishDate 1998
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/07662051676917436314
work_keys_str_mv AT báiqīngsuì studyontheapplicationofteachingmanpowerinconductingoralhealtheducationprogram
AT báiqīngsuì kǒuqiāngwèishēngjiàoyùtuīguǎngshīzīyùnyòngdeyánjiū
_version_ 1716839121169678336