The Study on the status of painting from Renaissance to the Encyclopedie edited by Diderot

碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 藝術學研究所 === 86 === Abstract My thesis mainly discussed a delicate relationship between the status ofpainting and concept of art.During the Middle age,painting was viewed as theMechanical arts which opposed to the Liberal a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yeh, Chai-hua, 葉嘉華
Other Authors: Wu Fang-cheng
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1998
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00416364676647388046
id ndltd-TW-086NCU00546003
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-086NCU005460032015-10-13T11:06:16Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00416364676647388046 The Study on the status of painting from Renaissance to the Encyclopedie edited by Diderot 從文藝復興到狄德羅主編的百科全書探討繪畫地位的轉變及其意義 Yeh, Chai-hua 葉嘉華 碩士 國立中央大學 藝術學研究所 86 Abstract My thesis mainly discussed a delicate relationship between the status ofpainting and concept of art.During the Middle age,painting was viewed as theMechanical arts which opposed to the Liberal arts. Through the humanistic discourse on Renaissance,the status of painting was clined to the liberal artsgraually. Up to 17th century,French Academy accepted painting as one of theliberal arts.After fifty years,painting was transferred to be the Fine arts.Asan obervation on this process, this thesis doesn't make any conlcusion,but choose certain method and data properly during my discussion. This thesis os divided into three chapters in accordance with the development on the status of painting.The first chapter explains how humanism in Renaissan-ce, constructed the developmental foundation of discourse on painting.According to A.Chastel's analysis,it indicates the domain of rhetoric and concept of drawing constructed the condition of painting which moves it's placeto the liberal arts through rational dicipline. I select some viewpoints from C.Le Brun, A.Felibien, R. de Piles to make a comparison with each other.Besides,the system of knowledge charged and a lot of new knowledge was produced at the same time.For dealing with this phenomenon, systematization was created next century. In 18th century, painting transferred from liberal arts to fine arts.Thereforethe third chapter,the most important part in this thesis,expresses the develop-ment after painting has been included as the fine arts.In this chapter,I take the Encyclopedia(1750-1780)as my research material, which edited by D.Diderot.In the begining, I consider the System of Human Knowledge of Encyclopedia which presented the framework of systematization.Systematization is considered asituation that formulated a new system which mix the new and the old knowledge.The contributor wrote those articles on the fine arts,quoted the Empiricism as their basic for discussion which resulted in painting got higher status thanthe other arts in the fine arts.From maintaining the old system,the contributorsdidn't complete the function of systematization. D. Diderot, the main editor of Encyclopedia and the contributor of the article <Art>,attempted to achieve this object. He tried to mix the new and the old knowledges, and this attitudeimplied on his viewpoints of traditional dialectic debate between themechanical arts and the liberal srts. In the article <Art>, he distillsan abstract concept from the crafts (arts) and manufactures. And he emphasized on the importance of the mechanical arts. When he located paintingon the sphere of the mechanical arts, he didn't look down upon it. On the contrary, he possessed more objective attitude on painting. The status of painting tended to be stable on the 18th century. Wu Fang-cheng 吳方正 1998 學位論文 ; thesis 102 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 藝術學研究所 === 86 === Abstract My thesis mainly discussed a delicate relationship between the status ofpainting and concept of art.During the Middle age,painting was viewed as theMechanical arts which opposed to the Liberal arts. Through the humanistic discourse on Renaissance,the status of painting was clined to the liberal artsgraually. Up to 17th century,French Academy accepted painting as one of theliberal arts.After fifty years,painting was transferred to be the Fine arts.Asan obervation on this process, this thesis doesn't make any conlcusion,but choose certain method and data properly during my discussion. This thesis os divided into three chapters in accordance with the development on the status of painting.The first chapter explains how humanism in Renaissan-ce, constructed the developmental foundation of discourse on painting.According to A.Chastel's analysis,it indicates the domain of rhetoric and concept of drawing constructed the condition of painting which moves it's placeto the liberal arts through rational dicipline. I select some viewpoints from C.Le Brun, A.Felibien, R. de Piles to make a comparison with each other.Besides,the system of knowledge charged and a lot of new knowledge was produced at the same time.For dealing with this phenomenon, systematization was created next century. In 18th century, painting transferred from liberal arts to fine arts.Thereforethe third chapter,the most important part in this thesis,expresses the develop-ment after painting has been included as the fine arts.In this chapter,I take the Encyclopedia(1750-1780)as my research material, which edited by D.Diderot.In the begining, I consider the System of Human Knowledge of Encyclopedia which presented the framework of systematization.Systematization is considered asituation that formulated a new system which mix the new and the old knowledge.The contributor wrote those articles on the fine arts,quoted the Empiricism as their basic for discussion which resulted in painting got higher status thanthe other arts in the fine arts.From maintaining the old system,the contributorsdidn't complete the function of systematization. D. Diderot, the main editor of Encyclopedia and the contributor of the article <Art>,attempted to achieve this object. He tried to mix the new and the old knowledges, and this attitudeimplied on his viewpoints of traditional dialectic debate between themechanical arts and the liberal srts. In the article <Art>, he distillsan abstract concept from the crafts (arts) and manufactures. And he emphasized on the importance of the mechanical arts. When he located paintingon the sphere of the mechanical arts, he didn't look down upon it. On the contrary, he possessed more objective attitude on painting. The status of painting tended to be stable on the 18th century.
author2 Wu Fang-cheng
author_facet Wu Fang-cheng
Yeh, Chai-hua
葉嘉華
author Yeh, Chai-hua
葉嘉華
spellingShingle Yeh, Chai-hua
葉嘉華
The Study on the status of painting from Renaissance to the Encyclopedie edited by Diderot
author_sort Yeh, Chai-hua
title The Study on the status of painting from Renaissance to the Encyclopedie edited by Diderot
title_short The Study on the status of painting from Renaissance to the Encyclopedie edited by Diderot
title_full The Study on the status of painting from Renaissance to the Encyclopedie edited by Diderot
title_fullStr The Study on the status of painting from Renaissance to the Encyclopedie edited by Diderot
title_full_unstemmed The Study on the status of painting from Renaissance to the Encyclopedie edited by Diderot
title_sort study on the status of painting from renaissance to the encyclopedie edited by diderot
publishDate 1998
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00416364676647388046
work_keys_str_mv AT yehchaihua thestudyonthestatusofpaintingfromrenaissancetotheencyclopedieeditedbydiderot
AT yèjiāhuá thestudyonthestatusofpaintingfromrenaissancetotheencyclopedieeditedbydiderot
AT yehchaihua cóngwényìfùxìngdàodídéluózhǔbiāndebǎikēquánshūtàntǎohuìhuàdewèidezhuǎnbiànjíqíyìyì
AT yèjiāhuá cóngwényìfùxìngdàodídéluózhǔbiāndebǎikēquánshūtàntǎohuìhuàdewèidezhuǎnbiànjíqíyìyì
AT yehchaihua studyonthestatusofpaintingfromrenaissancetotheencyclopedieeditedbydiderot
AT yèjiāhuá studyonthestatusofpaintingfromrenaissancetotheencyclopedieeditedbydiderot
_version_ 1716837702711640064