| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立體育學院 === 體育研究所 === 86 === This study had analyzed the identification tendencies and teaching effects of the elementary school physical education objectives, 70 pulic elementary schools were used to be the mother teachers wrere chosen to be the subjects, 973 questionnaires from 1, 493 teachers that 65 percent were returned validly. The conclusions of this study were as follows;
Ⅰ.The identification tendencies of physical education in teaching objectives.
A.The factor of physical education in teaching objectives.
1.The identification tendencies of the elementary school physical education in teaching objective including elementary school physical education curriculum goals that Ministry of Education had promulgated. Objectives of the elementary school teachers on teaching physical education identification, had 7 small objectives, including recognition of sport knowledge, reconognition of sport health protection, creative recognition, basic sport ability, special sport skill, physical fitness and, affective learning, etceteras.
2.The identification tendencies of the elementary school teachers'' physical education in teaching objectives were highly recognized, and affective objective was the most important, sport skill and physical fitness was the last. Ministry of education had been promulgating physical fitness was the most important objective for physical education in teaching was not widely accepted yet by elementary school teachers,.
B.The identification tendencies of physical education in teaching objectives for different variables of individually background teacher.
1.That different gender of teachers had significant differences in teaching objectives, and the female teachers had higher identification tendencies than male teachers.
2.That different educational background teachers had no significant difference in teaching objectives.
3.That different service years teachers had significant difference in teaching objectives, and that older teachers had higher identification tendencies than student teachers.
C.The identification tendencies of physical education in teaching objectives for different variables of environment background teacher.
1.That different size of schools had no significant difference in teaching objectives for teachers, but recognition of sport health protection had significant difference.
2.That different duty had no significant difference in teaching objectives for teachers, but only all recognize domain and recognition of sport health protection had significant difference.
3.That different grade had not significant difference in teaching objectives for teachers, but creative recognition had significant difference.
4.That numbers of students in the classroom had not significant difference in teaching objectives for teachers, but affection domain had significant difference.
Ⅱ.The teaching effects of physical education in teaching objectives.
A.The teaching effects of physical education in teaching objectives in every area.
1.The teaching effects of physical education in teaching objectives were not good. The affection objective the best, but sport skill and physical fitness was the worst objectives.
B.The teaching effects of physical education in teaching the objective were variable because of the individual background teachers.
1.That different gender teachers had signifecantly different effects in teaching objectivese, and the male teachers had highly effects tendencies than female teachers.
2.That different educational background teachers had significantly different effects in teaching objectives. Graduates of physical education department were better than other.
3.That different service years teachers had significantly different effects in teaching objectives, and that older teachers were highly identification tendencies than student teachers.
C.The identification tendencies of physical education in teaching objectives for different variables of environment background teacher.
1.That different sizes of schools had no significantly different effects in teaching objectives for teachers.
2.That different duty had significantly different effects in teaching objectives for teachers, classromm teacher were lowly tendentious than other.
3.That different grade had singnificantly different effects in teaching objectives for teachers, the lower grade teachers had lower tendentious.
4.That numbers of students in the classroom had not significantly different effects in teaching objectives for teachers.
Ⅲ.The relationship between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives.
A.The correlation and difference of the identification tendencies and the teaching effects between in physical education teaching objectives.
1.That were significant correlation between the physical education teaching objectives identification tendencies and the teaching effects.
2.That were signifcant difference between the physical education teaching objectives identification tendencies and the teaching effects.
B.The gap were between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects between in physical education teaching objectives for different variables of individually background teachers.
1.The gap had significant difference between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives for different gender teachers.
2.The gap had significant difference between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives for different educational background teachers.
3.The gap had no significant difference between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives for different service years teachers.
C.The gap were between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives for different variables of environment background teacher.
1.The gap had no significant difference between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives for different size school teachers.
2.The gap had significant difference between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives for duty tape of teachers.
3.The gap had significant difference between the identification ten identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives for different grade of teachers.
4.The gap had no significant difference between the identification tendencies and the teaching effects in physical education teaching objectives for teachers with different number of students in a classroom.
Based on the results of this study, the implications for the physical education teaching and suggestions for the future studies are discussed.
|
|---|
