A research on the transformation of inhabitation of atayal aborignal in sha-yun.

• Main Authors: Lin Jyh-Ming, 林志明
• Other Authors: Huang Jiunn-Ming
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 1998
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/01264001351630381412

碩士 === 中原大學 === 建築研究所 === 86 === The author considers the culture of atayal aboriginal inhabitation from settlement and house,and to discuss the inhabitation and the change from the space constituent and behavior of inhabitation. We can understand the former culture of inhabitation by studying documents and interview. Besides, we understand the current tribe by field working. The papers have five chapters. First, the explanation of the aim and the method of discourse prints in the part. Second, it discuses the change of space constituent, Settlement: A tribal was the basic unit of atayal former settlement, it includes group of houses, farms, hunting filed and grave. A village is a suitable unit in current settlement. A settlement can be division into a village, tribal and houses. The author explain the usage and acknowledge of the settlement space by the inhabitants from the phenomenon of broaden the scope of living space and the phenomenon of privatization of land. When land be private, it enhances the family property, and reduces the ownerHouse: We can classify the change of room into three parts: single-room, early compound-room, current compound-room. When it becomes compound-room from single-room, the furnace is an important index. It means not only the change of behavior, but also the change of religion. The change of houses has a close relationship with the environments and economy. Atayal can accept all kind of technique and use it suitably without taboos. So it can display vary kinds of architecture culture.