An Examination of Grice's Approach to the Semantics of Indicative Conditionals

碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 哲學研究所 === 86 === Are indicative conditionals are material conditionals? Are they truth-functional? Philosophers disagree. My dissertation primarily examines Grice's view on these matters. Grice claimed that the conventional meaning of an indicative conditional is th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsai Dylan Bo-shen, 蔡柏生
Other Authors: Jerry Seligman
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 1998
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/91712366371463318698
id ndltd-TW-086CCU00259004
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-086CCU002590042016-01-22T04:17:30Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/91712366371463318698 An Examination of Grice's Approach to the Semantics of Indicative Conditionals 直述條件句:格萊斯進路之初探 Tsai Dylan Bo-shen 蔡柏生 碩士 國立中正大學 哲學研究所 86 Are indicative conditionals are material conditionals? Are they truth-functional? Philosophers disagree. My dissertation primarily examines Grice's view on these matters. Grice claimed that the conventional meaning of an indicative conditional is the same as that of the corresponding material conditional. But, when a speaker uses an indicative conditional, we think he conveys more information. Grice thought that, in fact, this piece of information is an implicature to be explained by his pragmatic theory rather than part of the conventional meaning. Grice presented two main accounts: one is the cooperative principle account, and the other is the special function account. The former claims that the implicature results from an assumption,that speakers and hearers are engaged in cooperative conversation, observing the Cooperative Principle. Simply speaking, we can derive the additional information from the conventional meaning of the words being used and the assumption that the speaker observes the Cooperative Principle. Grice's other account is that indicative conditionals have a special expressive function,to present an inferential passage from the antecedent to the consequent. When a speaker uses an indicative conditional in this way, he indirectly suggests that there are some non-truth-functional grounds for passing form antecedent to the consequent.My dissertation addresses whether Grice's accounts provide a satisfactory explanation. In particular, I try to introduce them as clearly as possible in order to show the reasonableness of his approach. This is often obstructed by his text, which is not easy to understand. In doing so, I also address Grice's theory of implicature, and some problems concerning confirmation,informativeness, and embedded conditionals. Jerry Seligman 謝立民 1998 學位論文 ; thesis 156 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 哲學研究所 === 86 === Are indicative conditionals are material conditionals? Are they truth-functional? Philosophers disagree. My dissertation primarily examines Grice's view on these matters. Grice claimed that the conventional meaning of an indicative conditional is the same as that of the corresponding material conditional. But, when a speaker uses an indicative conditional, we think he conveys more information. Grice thought that, in fact, this piece of information is an implicature to be explained by his pragmatic theory rather than part of the conventional meaning. Grice presented two main accounts: one is the cooperative principle account, and the other is the special function account. The former claims that the implicature results from an assumption,that speakers and hearers are engaged in cooperative conversation, observing the Cooperative Principle. Simply speaking, we can derive the additional information from the conventional meaning of the words being used and the assumption that the speaker observes the Cooperative Principle. Grice's other account is that indicative conditionals have a special expressive function,to present an inferential passage from the antecedent to the consequent. When a speaker uses an indicative conditional in this way, he indirectly suggests that there are some non-truth-functional grounds for passing form antecedent to the consequent.My dissertation addresses whether Grice's accounts provide a satisfactory explanation. In particular, I try to introduce them as clearly as possible in order to show the reasonableness of his approach. This is often obstructed by his text, which is not easy to understand. In doing so, I also address Grice's theory of implicature, and some problems concerning confirmation,informativeness, and embedded conditionals.
author2 Jerry Seligman
author_facet Jerry Seligman
Tsai Dylan Bo-shen
蔡柏生
author Tsai Dylan Bo-shen
蔡柏生
spellingShingle Tsai Dylan Bo-shen
蔡柏生
An Examination of Grice's Approach to the Semantics of Indicative Conditionals
author_sort Tsai Dylan Bo-shen
title An Examination of Grice's Approach to the Semantics of Indicative Conditionals
title_short An Examination of Grice's Approach to the Semantics of Indicative Conditionals
title_full An Examination of Grice's Approach to the Semantics of Indicative Conditionals
title_fullStr An Examination of Grice's Approach to the Semantics of Indicative Conditionals
title_full_unstemmed An Examination of Grice's Approach to the Semantics of Indicative Conditionals
title_sort examination of grice's approach to the semantics of indicative conditionals
publishDate 1998
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/91712366371463318698
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaidylanboshen anexaminationofgricesapproachtothesemanticsofindicativeconditionals
AT càibǎishēng anexaminationofgricesapproachtothesemanticsofindicativeconditionals
AT tsaidylanboshen zhíshùtiáojiànjùgéláisījìnlùzhīchūtàn
AT càibǎishēng zhíshùtiáojiànjùgéláisījìnlùzhīchūtàn
AT tsaidylanboshen examinationofgricesapproachtothesemanticsofindicativeconditionals
AT càibǎishēng examinationofgricesapproachtothesemanticsofindicativeconditionals
_version_ 1718161876365344768