A Study on the Evaluation of Pavement Structural Capacity Using the Artificial Neural Network

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 土木工程學系 === 85 === Using nondestructive deflection measurements to evaluate pavementstructural capacity has become popular for highway angencies recently.Surface deflection basins obtained directly from nondestructive tes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huang, Yi-Hsia, 黃一峽
Other Authors: Liu Ming-Jen
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 1997
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/55448672879987343850
Description
Summary:碩士 === 淡江大學 === 土木工程學系 === 85 === Using nondestructive deflection measurements to evaluate pavementstructural capacity has become popular for highway angencies recently.Surface deflection basins obtained directly from nondestructive testingdevices can be transferred to deflection indices or layer moduli throughbackcalculations. However, deflection indices can only give very roughdescription of the pavement structural condition. Backcalculations oflayer moduli, however, usually involve great computation times andsometimes with the possibility that their solutions would not converge. Artificial neural networks provide a fundamental new approach tobackcalculation of layer moduli from nondestructive deflectionmeasurements. An artificial neural network is a highly interconnectedcollection of simple processing elements that can be trained toapproximate a complex, nonlinear function through repeated exposure toexamples of the function. One backpropagation neural etwork was utilizedto backcalculate layer moduli for four-layer pavement profiles. Two types of nondestructive testing device, Road Rater and FallingWeight Deflectometer, were simulated in this study. Synthetic deflectionbasins generated by the ELSYM5 program and a wide variety of layer moduliwere used as training sets. Subsequent testing showed that the networkcould backcalculate pavement layer moduli accurately. Four seperatenetworks were then trained to backcalculate layer moduli, E1, E2, E3, E4, respectively, using the same training sets. The results showed thatfour-network approach performed better than one-network approach especiallyin E4 backcalculation.